Monday, January 15, 2007


The 45th Game…

On January 14, 2004, the Caps tied Calgary, 3-3, in their 45th game of the season. The outcome isn’t as important as who was responsible. It speaks to where the Caps are through 45 games this year. If one looks at the roster that took the ice that night and compares it to the rosters that took the ice in the 45th games of the following seasons (a 5-4 shootout win against St. Louis in 2005-2006, and a 7-3 loss to Florida last Saturday night), what is remarkable is the turnover:

2003-2004 2005-2006 2006-2007


Bates Battaglia Matt Bradley Matt Bradley
Peter Bondra Alex Ovechkin Alex Ovechkin
Mike Grier Brooks Laich Brooks Laich
Jeff Halpern Colin Forbes Kris Beech
Jaromir Jagr Chris Clark Chris Clark
Robert Lang Dainius Zubrus Dainius Zubrus
Kip Miller Ben Clymer Ben Clymer
Matt Pettinger Matt Pettinger Matt Pettinger
Trent Whitfield Brian Sutherby Brian Sutherby
Stephen Peat Brian Willsie Donald Brashear
Darcy Verot Boyd Gordon Boyd Gordon
Alexander Semin Jeff Friesen Alexander Semin


Jason Doig Mathieu Biron Jamie Heward
Sergei Gonchar Bryan Muir Lawrence Nycholat
Brendan Witt Brendan Witt Mike Green
Rick Berry Nolan Yonkman Steve Eminger
Joel Kwiatlowski Shaone Morrisonn Shaone Morrisonn
Todd Rohloff Ivan Majesky Brian Pothier


Olaf Kolzig Olaf Kolzig Olaf Kolzig
Rastislav Stana Brent Johnson Brent Johnson

Of the 20 players taking the ice in that 45th game two seasons ago, only three – Matt Pettinger, Olaf Kolzig, and Alexander Semin (who missed the 2005-2006 season) took the ice on Saturday. The entire defense has been replaced.

The table inserts players in their rough approximations of who replaced whom (there are obvious mismatches of roles because of carryover elsewhere – Brian Willsie for Stephen Peat comes to mind). And what is striking there is the difference between a team “on paper” and the one that takes the ice. If you look at certain positions “on paper” there is a considerable drop off in talent. For example, I don’t know anyone who is likely to take Chris Clark over Jaromir Jagr in a fantasy league. Or Lawrence Nycholat over Sergei Gonchar. But the 2006-2007 team is 13 points better – more than 40 percent – than that 2003-2004 club. There is a “glass half full,” “glass half empty” aspect to that. Sure, the Caps are improved, but they’ve left a lot of points on the ice this year, too.

It’s frustrating – for fans, certainly, but it has to be that way for players, too. One step up, one step back, and the guys are at 45 points in 45 games. But there is a bigger picture here, as well. Through 45 games, the Caps had those 32 points in 2003-2004. Last year, they had 37 points (16-24-5). 45 this year. The improvement has been consistent and significant from year to year, which really is the object of the exercise. And this is a group that has not spent all that much time playing together, especially at this level of play. What the team needs are the factors that make diamonds out of coal – time and pressure. Time to develop that knowledge of one another and the pressure of having to deal with different situations, including emerging expectations among fans of a playoff run . . . soon.


Anonymous said...

The Caps are making gradual improvement, but they will have to eventually bring in players to make a leap. I think they have a better grasp of the players that will form the core of the team long term. I think that was management's goal this season. Adding two or three quality players to this team in the offseason would help it make the playoffs, and to actually do something positive.
I'd rather have the Caps next season than to have a team like NJ or NYR.

Capital Fanatic said...

Good analysis. However, you have to take into consideration that in 2004 there were no shootouts or points given for overtime losses. That would make a difference when comparing points between the years.

The Peerless said...

There were, in fact, points for overtime losses in 2003-2004. The Caps were 23-46-10-3 (the ten and three being the ties and OTLs) for 59 points.

3 Grumpy Caps fans said...

Like the roster breakdown, but would have loved to see next year's projected lineup with Backstrom knocking Beech off the list and Fehr at the wing. With a team that's building towards the future like this one is important to see this year's lineup as a work in progress.