Washington Capitals 2013-2014 Previews -- Defensemen: Mike Green

Mike Green 

Theme:  "Give a man health and a course to steer, and he'll never stop to trouble about whether he's happy or not.”

-- George Bernard Shaw

“I think it’s time to become a dangerous player again.” Thus spoke Washington Capitals defenseman Mike Green last week.  The “again” reference reflects the fact that Green was the most dangerous offensive force from the blue line in the NHL until a series of injuries limited him to 116 of 212 regular season games over the past three seasons.  Before that, Green played in 225 of 246 regular season games and composed a 68-137-205 scoring line (a 25-50-75 average per 82 games) from 2007-2008 through 2009-2010.

Last season, Green came back…sort of.  In January 2012 Green underwent sports hernia surgery to “eliminate the unknown” with respect to his recurring groin problems.  Green returned in February of the 2011-2012 season but did not record a goal in his last 22 regular season games (0-1-1).  He had two in 14 playoff games that season (2-2-4), but was clearly not all the way back.

An off season to recuperate in full was supposed to solve the remaining problems, but even with the delayed start to the 2012-2013 season, Green missed 13 of the Caps’ first 29 games with a “lower body injury.”  He dressed for the last 19 games of the season for Washington, going 10-9-19.  He was a terror on the power play, going 4-7-11 on the man advantage over those last 19 games.  The four power play goals (his total for the season) would have put him in the top 50 defensemen in total goals scored, a feat made more impressive by the fact that he did it in only those 19 games to end the season.

As it was, Green ended the 2012-2013 season leading all defensemen in total goals – 12, a total that represented a 28-goal pace per 82 games.  He had a 43-goal pace over those last 19 games, which brought memories of 2008-2009 (31 goals in 68 games) to mind among Caps fans.  That is the line of a dangerous player.

Fearless’ Take…

As valuable and productive as Alex Ovechkin was last season, getting Green back to good health in the last 19 games last season was the push the Caps needed.  The Caps were 7-0-1 in games in which Green scored at least one goal (he had two against Carolina and Boston, both wins).  The Caps were 11-1-1 in games in which he recorded at least one point.

And before you think Green fattened up against the Southeast Division, he was 5-3-8 in 14 games against teams in the division, 7-11-18 in 21 games against teams outside the Southeast.

Even with all the games Green missed over the past three seasons, no defenseman has more goals scored than Green since the 2007-2008 season, and he is the active leader in points (second to retired Detroit Red Wings defenseman Nicklas Lidstrom).  Zdeno Chara is second among active defensemen in points to Green, but he has played in 104 more regular season games over that span of time than Green.

Cheerless’ Take…

For what it’s worth, Mike Green was tied for 34^th among defensemen in even strength points last season.  He had only four even strength assists.  That was a neighborhood that included T.J. Brennan, Eric Gryba, and Simon Depres.

Maybe it was related, but among 210 defensemen playing at least 20 games last season, Green was 125^th in Corsi/on-ice at 5-on-5.  And his Corsi/on-ice relative to Corsi/off-ice was 134^th among that group.  What it meant was that his goals-for/on-ice per 60 minutes at 5-on-5 ranked only 133^rd among those 210 defensemen, and his plus-minus/60 minutes at 5-on-5 ranked 136^th.

The Big Question… Is Mike Green healthy, or his he “healthy?”

It is September.  Mike Green has not played a regular season game yet.  He is healthy… fresh as a daisy (figuratively speaking).  So are dozens of other players at this time of year.  But the question is still out on whether he is “healthy,” as in “can he sustain himself to play in 70 or more games?”

This is an important question to settle as the season unfolds for this reason.  When Mike Green plays, the Caps win more often than not.  In the three years covering the 2007-2008 through 2009-2010 season the Caps won 133 of 225 games played by Green (50.2 percent).  These were his most durable years.  In the last three seasons the Caps won 66 of the 116 games he played (56.9 percent).  Even in less frequent appearances, Green’s presence coincided with success.

More to the point, over the last six seasons the Caps have won 73.1 percent of all the regular season games in which Green has registered at least one point.  How many games Green dresses for this season is going to go a long way to answering the question of whether this team can reach the playoffs under their new divisional alignment.  Not that this should be any news to Caps fans.

In the end…

Last season was Green’s second best of his career on a goals-per-game basis.  He registered his third highest points-per-game.  And even with his injury problems over the past three years, here is something to consider.  Green played 116 games over that span, average 0.20 goals per game and 0.49 points per game.  How other many defensemen played in at least that many games and had those averages or better for goals and points?  Three – Dustin Byfuglien, Erik Karlsson, and Shea Weber.  If not clearly the best offensive defenseman he was over that 2007-2008 through 2009-2010 period, he is part of a short list of such defensemen even now.

This is what makes the upcoming season so tantalizing.  If he has put his injury plague behind him, Green is not so far removed from being one of, if not the most prolific point producers from the blue line in the NHL.  If he was to play in 70 games and produce as he did the last three seasons, he would finish with a scoring line of 14-20-34.  If, however, he was to return to that level of production he enjoyed from 2007-2008 through 2009-2010, a 70-game season would mean a scoring line of 21-43-64.  We suspect his production will fall between those boundaries.  It would still make him plenty dangerous.

Projection: 72 games, 17-32-49, plus-4

Photo: Elsa/Getty Images North America

Countdown to Opening Night by the Elements: Number 6

Fearless has gone on with this series almost as long as some legislators filibuster.  But now he is down to a six-pack of elements…

Carbon

The discovery of carbon dates back about six millennia, to the Egyptians and Sumerians in the manufacture of bronze.  On particular form of carbon – diamonds – were known of more than four millennia ago in China.  It might have been known of and used as charcoal in the earliest of human civilizations.

Since those early beginnings carbon has occupied a central place in human social, industrial and biological evolution.  Beginning with the latter, carbon is the basis for all organic life on this planet.  This is a product of its unique ability to form long-chains binding with other carbon atoms, and to its unique chemical bond characteristics.  It employs these characteristics to form simple sugars, complex carbohydrates, alcohols, fats, amino acids (from which proteins assemble), nucleic acids, adenosine triphosphate (the most important chemical you probably have never heard of – it is the basis for energy transfer in all living cells), and a variety of more exotic organic compounds.

It is an element that remains constant in volume on earth, meaning that when carbon is a part of physical processes, it must come from somewhere (or something) and be deposited somewhere else (or in something else).  This “carbon cycle” of inputs and outputs is reflected in such processes as carbon respiration in plants and in consumption and metabolism of nutrients.

Which brings us to its industrial evolution.  Its discovery as an element starts in 1722 with René Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur (“Grande Toni,” for short) transforming iron into steel by introducing an intermediary element.  That element would be carbon.   Fifty years later Antoine Lavoisier (“Petit Toni” for short) demonstrated that diamond is a form of carbon.  Just two years after that, Carl Wilhelm Scheele (who for some reason was nicknamed, “Swedish Toni”) showed that graphite was yet another form of carbon.  It was left to Lavoisier to settle on the name for the element, identifying it as “carbon” in a chemical textbook he published in 1789.

Having been identified as occurring in a number of different forms was not enough.  It was found to be the essential element of crude oil and comprising the structural element of plants (through cellulose, an extremely long chain carbon-based molecule).  Given these forms and sources, it became the basis for a huge variety of applications, including: steel manufacture, “lead” pencils (in which the “lead” is primarily graphite), dry batteries, paint and ink, food preparation (charcoal grilling), structural carbon fiber, electroplating, nuclear power generation (as a neutron moderator in reactors), and plastics.

It is one of the rare elements that has incorporated itself in the social evolution of man, primarily in its diamond form.  They are a girl’s best friend, they serve as the basis for commitment for couples, they serve to signal significant anniversaries.

We have an element that is the centerpiece of living processes, an element that is central to the inputs and outputs of biology.  It is an element that takes many forms and has many applications, limited only it seems by the imagination of those searching for applications.  It has an important place in the social fabric of human history.  It is not unlike a figure who occupies a central role in the life of a hockey team, one concerned with the inputs and outputs of the on-ice product, one whose imagination can mold its many forms into a variety of strategies and approaches for winning hockey.

Carbon…the “Adam Oates” of the elements of the periodic table.

Tonight! A Special Event!! (well, maybe)

Countdown to Opening Night by the Elements: Number 7

Only one week to Opening Night, which means Fearless is down to number 7 in the elements of the period table.  Who might the Washington Capital we find here?...

Nitrogen

At what scientists refer to as “standard temperature and pressure (pretty much what you live in),” nitrogen is virtually inert.  It does not do much, does not react with much.  It is, however, a very important element for how it behaves as an element.  It binds with itself to form the molecule “N₂.”  This bond between the two atoms of nitrogen is extremely strong, difficult to break in the process of chemical reactions.  That strong bond reflects a large amount of stored energy, which is released when compounds containing nitrogen are subjected to combustion or, in the case of organic materials, decay.  Nitrogen occurs in all organisms, primarily in proteins and nucleic acids, essential building blocks of life processes and structures.

Some of the usual suspects (especially those involved in the discovery of oxygen) were present for the discovery of nitrogen – Carl Wilhelm Scheele, Joseph Priestly, Antoine Laurent Lavoisier.  But it was Daniel Rutherford, a Scottish chemist, who is credited with discovering it.  The problem, it turned out, was naming the element.  Rutherford called it “fixed air.”  Priestly referred to it as “phlogisticated air.”  Lavoisier called it “mephitic air,” then “azote,” from the Greek word “azotos,” meaning “lifeless.”

The word “nitrogen” would not come for almost another 20 years, and we have Jean-Antoine Chaptal to thank for it.  His thinking was logical in a “chemistry” sense… “nitre” (another name for potassium nitrate, or “salt peter”), from which nitric acid could be produced, in which “nitrogen” was an essential element.  “Nitrogen” was picked as a combination of “nitre” and the Greek word “genes,” meaning forming…”nitre forming,” get it?

Nitrogen has a fair number of practical applications.  For instance, it is used as a food preservative or in fertilizers.  It has applications in electronics and in incandescent light bulbs.  It can be used to reduce fire hazards in environments with fuels present.  It can be a replacement for air in filling tires for high-performance applications (automotive or aircraft, generally).  It can be used to pressurize kegs of beer or ale.  It is also found in the explosives nitroglycerin and trinitrotoluene (TNT).  It is found in “super glue” and in Kevlar.  In its liquid form it is used as a refrigerant and can be used for some medical procedures (removing warts, for example). 

Nitrogen is an element that binds strongly with itself, brings with it a strong binding energy, can be found in a wide variety of applications, including: agriculture, fire management, food industries, medicine, refrigeration, and explosives.  Compounds containing nitrogen are very versatile and practical.  It might not have a flashy analog among hockey players, but it does reflect a certain essential and useful character.  Maybe not a top-line center, but a second-line version who contributes the necessary offense and responsible defense to make a good team a contender.

Nitrogen…the “Mikhail Grabovski” of the elements of the periodic table.

Washington Capitals 2013-2014 Previews -- Defensemen: John Erskine

John Erskine

Theme: “My range is limited.”

-- Bob Dylan

If you saw the movie, “Titanic,” you will know that the plot focused on the plight of Jack Dawson and Rose DeWitt Bukater, star-crossed lovers on a doomed ship.  Only briefly during the film did the moviegoer see scenes of men caked in soot, shoveling coal into the boilers powering the ship.  But without those guys doing that hard work, the ship would not have been going anywhere, and there would have been no story of the unsinkable ship, no movie.

That’s a bit of a roundabout way of saying that John Erskine is that specie of defenseman who does a lot of the hard, the dirty work and doesn’t figure prominently in the credits.  Doing that hard work is testimony to Erskine’s persistence and determination to carve out a role as an NHL player.  Despite enduring eight separate occasions in which he missed five or more games to injury as a member of the Washington Capitals, he is one of 148 defensemen to play in at least 300 games over the 2006-2007 to 2012-2013 period (coinciding with his career with the Capitals).  That sounds like a big number until you think of it in terms of there being 30 NHL teams and that it covers a seven-year period.

In 2012-2013 Erskine had a deceptively effective year in the context of his role.  He is by no means thought to be a significant contributor on offense, but he finished the year with his best goals-per-game level in his seven years with the Caps.  His points per game was surpassed only by his 2006-2007 season (his first with Washington). His shooting percentage was his best as a Cap, and his shots on goal per game was a career best.  He set a career best for average ice time per game.  And he did this comfortably within the boundaries of the rules.  His penalty minutes per game was a career low.

Let’s just not get carried away with that though.  A 3-3-6 scoring line in 30 games is not evidence of being Washington’s answer to Erik Karlsson.  Erskine’s role is more of the “serve and protect” variety.  Sometimes, that means engaging in the pugilistic arts.  And say what you will about Erskine, he is a stand-up guy.  When he is called upon or calls upon himself to play that role, he doesn’t do it against sunflowers.  Over the last three season Erskine has been involved in 11 bouts.  Here is the fight card (most recent first):

• Shawn Thornton (114 NHL regular season fights)
• George Parros (149)
• Bracken Kearns (49 AHL fights)
• Arron Asham (96)
• Chris Thorburn (68)
• Jared Boll (125)
• Andy Sutton (46)
• Mike Rupp (79)
• Ryan Malone (38)
• Eric Boulton (132)
• Milan Lucic (45)

Sometimes, Jack and Rose get to cavort on the promenade deck and on the Grand Staircase because the John Erskine’s of the world are below decks doing a lot of hard and, at times, necessary work.

Fearless’ Take…

How many Capitals defensemen had a higher PDO (sum of on-ice team shooting and team save percentages) at 5-on-5 last season than John Erskine?  None (minimum 20 games played).  How many had fewer offensive zone start shares at 5-on-5.  None.  Who had a better goals against-on ice/60 minutes at 5-on-5?  None.  The Caps were 21-7-2 in games in which Erskine dressed, 6-11-1 in games he did not.

Cheerless’ Take…

There were 201 defensemen who played in at least 20 games last year.  Only 19 of them had worse Corsi/on-ice numbers at 5-on-5.  In seven seasons with the Caps he has lost 127 games to injury or illness.  If you look at his salary cap hit, age and contract duration, his comparables look like Shane O’Brien, Cory Sarich, Michal Roszival, and Jordan Leopold.  Is his a good deal in that neighborhood?

The Big Question… Does John Erskine have the wherewithal to take on second pair minutes effectively?

There are two parts to that question – his own effectiveness and his effect on his partner’s.  Erskine averaged 18:27 in total ice time per game last season, a personal best in his 11-season career.  Given the narrative that attaches to Erskine (that he isn’t quick enough or well-rounded enough to take on a heavy minute load), you would think that high-volume minutes he logs puts the club in a bad situation.  Last year, the Caps were 7-2-0 in games in which Erskine recorded at least 20 minutes of ice time, and both losses were of the one-goal variety (3-2 to Ottawa and 2-1 to the Rangers, both on the road).

However, there is the matter of Erskine being 33 years old with a history of injury.  He lost a quarter of last season to an upper body injury and has played only 58 percent of the regular season games scheduled over his seven seasons with the Caps.  One has to think that someone is going to be occupying that 4D spot a significant amount of the time in Erskine’s place (all other things being equal, like any further personnel moves).

In the end…

John Erskine seems to be one of those players for whom fans are always thinking of or looking for a replacement.  He lacks foot speed, he doesn’t have any offensive game, he’s…something.  There might have been some ominous signs about his game in last spring’s playoff loss to the New York Rangers.  The Rangers scored 14 even strength goals in the seven-game series.  Erskine was on ice for eight of them.  He had the worst Corsi/on-ice value of any Capital defenseman and had the worst relative Corsi (his value on ice less his off-ice value).  And, regression being what it is, his PDO value (best among Caps defensemen during the regular season) was the second worst among defensemen in the playoffs for Washington.

Last season, Erskine skated more than 75 percent of his 5-on-5 time with John Carlson as his partner.  Whether that is how things will unfold this season is something that bears watching.  The Caps are not particularly settled once you get past their top three of Mike Green, Karl Alzner, and John Carlson.  Erskine, Jack Hillen, Steve Oleksy, Tomas Kundratek, and Dmitry Orlov could be competing for time on that second pair.  If Erskine wins the competition, it would seem likely that one of the others is going to have to fill in from time to time, perhaps significant minutes.  Because, while Erskine is one of those players who gives a supreme effort despite what others might view as shortcomings, the fruits of that effort often reveal themselves as time lost.  Being of limited range did not hurt Bob Dylan much.  For John Erskine, it might be a different story.

Projection: 59 games, 2-5-7, minus-3

Photo: Elsa/Getty Images North America

Countdown to Opening Night by the Elements: Number 8

We’re down to number 8 in Fearless’ look at the elements of the periodic table (he skipped number 9…Cheerless kept yammering about being anti-fluoridation or some such thing), which means we are down to…

Oxygen

Most of what you are is oxygen.  We do not mean in some metaphysical sense, that oxygen feeds your soul or something. No, most of what you are in the physical sense is oxygen, because it binds with hydrogen, producing water.  Water comprises most of the mass of living organisms.  It is that ubiquitous, that necessary for life processes.

When it is not cozying up to hydrogen to form water molecules, it exists naturally as a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas.  But if you think those qualities make it dull and lifeless, well…

It’s in the name.  “Oxygen” comes from two Greek words – “oxys,” meaning “acid,” and “genes,” meaning “producer.”  But we get ahead of ourselves a bit.  Way back in the 2^nd century, BCE (“Before the Common Era”), a fellow by the name of Philo of Byzantium conducted what are thought to be the first experiments on the relationship of combustion to air.  Philo didn’t get things quite right, though, thinking that air was “converted” into fire. 

That’s okay, though.  A lot of experimenters got close to figuring out what was at the heart of combustion, but didn’t quite get there.  Leonardo da Vinci, Robert Boyle, John Mayow – all of them respected figures in the annals of science – came up short.  Then things kind of took a turn.  A couple of German chemists – Georg Ernst Stahl and J.J. Becher – came up with something called the “phlogiston” theory, an odd duck of an idea that held that combustible materials were of essentially two parts. A “phlogisticated substance (we don’t make this up, we just report it)” that contains “phlogiston,” which is released when burned, and a “dephlogisticate” that is left behind as a result of combustion.

You know what we need now, don’t you?  A Swede!  Yup… Carl Wilhelm Scheele came along in the 1770’s and produced oxygen by heating oxides of mercury.  Only he called it “fire air.” A little later, Joseph Priestly confirmed the finding in England.  Antoine Laurent Lavoisier tried to horn in on the discovery, but he didn’t “discover” this fire air until after Priestly told him how he did it.  What Lavoisier did, though, was establish that the “phlogiston” theory was a crock (it was really, as we all know, a planet in Romulan space), and – this was the important part – establish that air was a mixture of two gases, one of which was what he called “vital air.”  That name being kind of dull, Lavoisier renamed vital air “oxygen.”  In the end, Priestly gets the credit for discovering the element because he published his findings first in what is chemistry’s most famous example of “you snooze, you lose.”  Sorry, Carl Wilhelm.

So now we have this element; what is it good for?  Well, lots.  First, it is an extremely reactive element.  Even though oxygen occurs naturally as a gas, it gets used up in a variety of reactions and has to be replenished in the atmosphere by photosynthesis in plants.  It is essential to biological function, establishing itself in proteins, carbohydrates, fats, inorganic structural elements (teeth, bones), and it is critical to respiratory processes.

It has other applications as well.  For example, oxygen therapy or hyperbaric treatment.  It is used as a breathing gas in pressurized space suits and to assist breathing in low-pressure environments (mountain-climbing, for example).  It is used in steel manufacture and welding.  It is an important element in rocket fuel.

It can be hazardous due to its reactivity.  In high concentrations it can promote rapid combustion.  An oxygen source in close proximity to a fuel source can result in explosion if a triggering mechanism is present.  If liquid oxygen leaches into organic material (that containing carbon), the material can explode spontaneously if jostled or force is applied to it.

What we are left with is an element that is as essential as there is for life processes.  It is the predominant element in the air that we breathe.  It is highly reactive, a critical element in rocket fuel, one capable of contributing to combustion or, in special situations, detonation.  It sounds like a foundational player, one without whom success would be nearly impossible.  A player capable of generating spontaneous reactions from fans with his rushes up ice and his ability to score from almost anywhere.  And, having the atomic number “8,” we have…

Oxygen…the “Alex Ovechkin” of the elements of the periodic table.

Washington Capitals 2013-2014 Previews -- Defensemen: John Carlson

John Carlson

Theme: “Success is a science; if you have the conditions, you get the result.”

-- Oscar Wilde

The position of defenseman in the National Hockey League is a grueling one.  It taxes the mind and body, and it is difficult to master.  John Carlson has established himself among the most durable defensemen in the league, having dressed for each of the league’s regular season games over the past three seasons.  Know how many other defensemen can make that claim?  Four: Matt Carle, Rob Scuderi, Keith Yandle, and Karl Alzner.  That’s it.  At age 23, Carlson has learned to deal with the mental and physical rigors of the game to be able to answer the call every night, and that is not a common characteristic in the NHL.

Next on the to-do list might be consistency.  Carlson’s first full season with the Capitals was a revelation.  He played in all 82 games (the only rookie defenseman to do so) and was among the rookie defenseman leaders in goals (tied for fourth), assists (tied for second), points (fourth), plus-minus (second), game-winning goals (tied for first), and ice time (first).

His sophomore season was not nearly as impressive.  He had trouble getting started at the offensive end of the ice (two points in his first eight games), then when his offensive game came around, he seemed to be on ice for just about every goal scored against the Caps.  He was on ice for 104 of the 226 goals against the Caps for the 2011-2012 season.  Only three defensemen were on ice for more goals against. 

Carlson rebounded to have a solid 2012 playoff, then continue the trend into the 2013 season in which he was on a career best 82-game pace in goals and points, and was on ice for only 33 even strength goals, an 82-game pace (56) almost as good as his rookie season (51).

Then, like the rest of the team, he slipped some in the seven-game loss to the New York Rangers in the first round of the post-season.  He finished the seven games with just one point (an assist in Game 3) and was on ice for eight of the 16 goals scored by the Rangers in the series.

Fearless’ Take…

Carlson has the offensive part of his game down, especially for one as young as he is.  Over the 2010-2011 through 2012-2013 period, Carlson is one of eight NHL defensemen 23 years of age or younger with at least 20 goals and at least 90 points.  He has been given a bigger power play role with the club, averaging more than two minutes per game last season (he averaged more than two minutes a game in 2010-2011, too, but this was more a product of Mike Green missing 33 games).

Now, let’s do a thought exercise (with pictures!).  Consider three defensemen and a few commonly referred-to 5-on-5 measures from last season…

You have figured out that John Carlson is one of these defensemen.  He is “Defenseman B.”  The other two are Ryan Suter (“Defenseman A”) and Zdeno Chara (“Defenseman C”).  Suter is 28 years old, with 590 games of regular season experience in the NHL, and has been a Norris Trophy finalist.  Chara is 36 years old, with 1,055 games, and has won a Norris Trophy.  Carlson is 23, with 234 games of regular season experience.  Yeah, yeah… small sample size, but it isn’t bad company, either.

Cheerless’ Take…

Let’s try another one of those thinkin’ exercises.  Here are two scoring lines:

18 games, 3-9-12, plus-19

30 games, 3-7-10, minus-8

That’s John Carlson against the Southeast Division and John Carlson against everyone else last season.  He was a “plus” player only four times all season against non-Southeast teams: Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal, and the New York Rangers.  Twelve of his 13 minus-games came against non-Southeast teams.

And here is an odd fact about his 2012-2013 season.  His offense dried up in the last 26 games.  He had four goals in his first 22 games, two in his last 28.  That was a product of both fewer shots and lower efficiency.  In his first 22 games he averaged 2.32 shots per game and converted on 7.84 percent of them.  He was on a pace to set a career best in shooting percentage.  But, in his last 26 games it was 1.77 shots per game and a 4.35 percent rate of scoring on them.  Not a lot in terms of shots per game difference, but it was a 24 percent drop in shots on goal overall.

The Big Question… Can John Carlson put together a solid, consistent 82 games?

This is not a simple question to answer.  The question implies a lack of consistency last season.  On one level, one could say Carlson lacked that consistency.  He had his ups and downs over the course of the season.  But Carlson had the odd circumstance of being matched with largely one-dimensional defensemen of entirely different types. 

Of his 810 minutes of 5-on-5 time last season, Carlson spent 373 minutes skating on a pair with John Erskine and another 189 minutes skating on a pair with Jack Hillen (he did not skate as many as 100 minutes with any other defensemen).  Erskine is a physical defenseman who provides little in the way of offense and does not have elite foot speed to play in his own end.  Hillen is a somewhat undersized defenseman who is perhaps more adept in the offensive end and who has had health issues over his career (he has not played more than 69 games in any of his six seasons and has missed time for jaw, concussion, and shoulder injuries). 

Carlson might be categorized as a two-way defenseman, but he might have been put in situations where he had to be one type while skating on one pair, a different one skating with another.  It might have been a bit much for a 23-year old defenseman with fewer than 250 games experience to deal with consistently.

In the end…

John Carlson will not lack for motivation this season.  There is the perennial chase for the Stanley Cup, of course.  But this season he has the added incentive of a potential spot on the United States men’s ice hockey Olympic team.  This incentive converges with his need to be more consistent.  As he put it himself, “I just need to stay consistent. That’s something that I’ve battled with, and after I got out of that start last season, I thought I played great game in and game out.  I’ve just got to work my butt off to make sure {Team USA management] can’t cross me off.”

One thing Carlson will have to avoid is a slow start, especially in his own end.  In Washington’s first 27 games last season the club allowed 82 goals.  Carlson was on ice for 41 of them.  What he is looking for is what he did in his last 21 games, over which he was on ice for only 20 goals.  As for the rest of his game, he will not get the power play time to be a top-shelf offensive producer.  That role still belongs to Mike Green, but he could be on the brink of becoming a solid 40-plus point performer from the blue line.  If he has the conditions – ice time, a top-four role, a stable and reliable partner, some time on the power play – he might just have the results he and the Caps (not to mention the U.S. Olympic Team) are looking for.

Projection: 82 games, 11-28-39, plus-11

Photo: Elsa/Getty Images North America

Washington Capitals 2013-2014 Previews -- Defensemen: Karl Alzner

Karl Alzner

Theme: “It's all in how you arrange the thing... the careful balance of the design is the motion.”

-- Andrew Wyeth

If you Googled “Karl Alzner” today and checked on news for the Caps defenseman, the first two stories were one about his road trip from British Columbia to Washington, the other a story about his treating his dogs to McDonalds to celebrate Murphy’s fifth birthday (he would be one of the dogs).  The dogs are probably more the “wild child” sort than is Alzner, as we found out a couple of years ago after a playoff game.  They (well, sort of) even have their own Twitter feed. 

It is that sort of low-key, balanced, dependable, salt of the earth sort of approach Alzner has brought to the ice in his five seasons in Washington (and gets him upstaged by his dogs).  He is not flashy, what with a career 82-game scoring pace of 2-12-14, plus-5 and having only two multi-point games in a 263-game career in the regular season. 

He does, however, draw the tough assignments.  In terms of 5-on-5 ice time faced, the top ten he faced in 2013 include:

Jordan Staal

Evander Kane

Jeff Skinner

Steven Stamkos

Martin St. Louis

Blake Wheeler

Nik Antropov

Ilya Kovalchuk

Marcel Goc

Olli Jokinen

That is, of course, heavily weighted to the Southeast Division, but that is a product of scheduling.  Against other divisions, though… he drew Patrice Bergeron and Tyler Seguin most often from among the Boston Bruins.  It was Ryan Callahan and Derek Stepan from the New York Rangers.  Evgeni Malkin and James Neal from Pittsburgh (source: stats.hockeyanalysis.com).  Alzner does not draw grinders.

The result was that his goals against/60 minutes at 5-on-5 was better than Dion Phaneuf, better than Rob Scuderi, better than Jay Bouwmeester, better than Robyn Regehr.  Perhaps as important, his being the stay-at-home sort allowed Mike Green to do his thing in the offensive side of the game (Alzner skated almost four times as many minutes with Green at 5-on-5 than he did with any other Caps defenseman).

Fearless’ Take…

Offense always lends itself more readily to analysis than defense, and Karl Alzner is a defensive defenseman.  So let’s look at this a bit subjectively for a moment.  Alzner signed a four-year/$11.2 million deal last July, a salary cap hit of $2.8 million a year.  If you look at his age, date of his contract signing, and cap hit, then compare it to his “comparable” comparables (from capgeek.com), the list looks like Michael Del Zotto, Jared Spurgeon, P.K. Subban, and Carl Gunnarsson.  Except for Subban, Alzner looks like a very good deal, even compared with this group. 

This is also a defenseman with fewer offensive zone starts at 5-on-5 last season than guys like Ryan McDonagh, Dan Girardi, Mark Stuart, Kevin Bieksa, Dan Hamhuis, Kimmo Timonen, and Anton Volchenkov.  Alzner has to be considered among the best at what he does among defensemen 25 or younger (he turns 25 on Tuesday).

Cheerless’ Take…

It is one thing to say that Karl Alzner tending to business in his own end frees things up for Mike Green to do his thing at the offensive end.  But if Alzner poses no threat in the offensive end, do teams load up to make things harder for Green on his side of the ice?  Green had 12 points at even strength in 35 games, only four assists.  That put him in the company of Alexei Emelin, Zach Bogosian, and Andrej Sekera in terms of even strength points per game. 

The Big Question… Does Karl Alzner have another gear in his offensive game?

Even by Karl Alzner’s modest standard, last year was a barren year on offense.  Going into last season his career per-82 game average scoring line was 2-13-15.  Last year he was 1-4-5 in 48 games, which works out to a 2-7-9 82-game scoring rate.  Alzner is not going to be the sort of defenseman who rushes the puck up ice to create offense, as does Mike Green.  He is not going to pound the net with booming shots like a John Carlson.  However, Alzner recorded progressively higher point totals when he played in Calgary in Canadian junior hockey, and he had a pair of 20-plus point seasons in Hershey in partial seasons before joining the Caps for good.  There could be some untapped potential there.

The idea here is not an either-or matter, that Alzner needs to trade some of his defensive game for a larger offensive footprint.  He is still young enough, at soon-to-be 25, to expand his game, to add more layers to it.  Part of it is efficiency.  Among defensemen playing in at least half his team’s games, Alzner finished tied for 137^th in shooting percentage at 2.6 percent, and that was higher than his career average going into the season (2.4 percent).  Another part of it is effectiveness.  Among that same group of defensemen last season, Alzner finished 121^st in total shots on goal.

Alzner is not likely to be a 20-point defenseman this season, but if he can be more of a threat from his side of the ice (and this is where coaching will come into play), even if he is not as prolific as a Mike Green or John Carlson, he could make defenses more honest.  Just a little more shot volume and maybe a little more efficiency on the shots he does take could do the trick.

In the end…

Alzner appears to have found an unexpected home.  The thinking since he and John Carlson broke into the league was that the two would form a foundation defensive pairing for a decade or more.  Last season Alzner spent more time with Mike Green at 5-on-5 (508:54) than he did with the rest of the roster defensemen combined (336:09), including John Carlson (79:38).  That now being a pair grown familiar with one another, better things might be in store at both ends of the ice.

However, any offense Alzner generates is, frankly, gravy for this team.  His stock in trade is his ability to deny the offense of others.  He does it, not with bone-crushing hits (107^th among 289 defensemen last season) or blocked shots (37^th), but with body and stick position, and a growing sense of awareness that comes with experience.  In that respect, what Caps fans should be expecting is that he do more of it.  Just don’t expect him to be flashy doing it.  Leave “flashy” to the dogs.

Projection: 82 games, 3-12-15, plus-6

Photo: Bruce Bennett/Getty Images North America

Washington Capitals 2013-2014 Previews -- Forwards: Joel Ward

Joel Ward

Theme: “If we will be quiet and ready enough, we shall find compensation in every disappointment.”

-- Henry David Thoreau

Joel Ward is in a select society of Washington Capitals.  He is one of three players in franchise history to end a playoff series in overtime with a goal.  He took his place alongside Dale Hunter (1988) and Joe Juneau (1998) when he scored in overtime in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference quarterfinal series against the defending Stanley Cup champion Boston Bruins in 2012. 

Then, misfortune.  It was his double-minor penalty taken for high-sticking with 22 seconds left in Game 5 of the conference semis that gave the New York Rangers a four-minute power play.  The Rangers scored on both ends – the first with 6.6 seconds left in regulation to tie, then at 1:35 into the first overtime to give the Rangers the win and deny the Caps the chance to go up 3-2 in games.  The Caps lost the series in seven games.

How did Ward respond to the high and the low when he returned for the 2013 season?  He played in each of the Caps’ first 39 games, going 8-12-20, plus-7 in the process.  He ended that run with a flourish, recording a goal (the game-winner) and an assist in earning the first star in a 4-2 win over Tampa Bay on April 7^th.

However, that game would be his last in the regular season.  With 8:48 gone in the third period, and the Caps clinging to a 3-2 lead, Ward blocked a shot by Lightning defenseman Sami Salo.  Ward suffered a contusion to his left knee.  He missed the last nine games of the regular season, but he would return from that injury in time for Game 1 against the Rangers in the Eastern Conference quarterfinals and would tie for the team lead in scoring against New York in the seven-game series (although four points to lead the team should not be seen as all that impressive; that a grinder getting 13 minutes a game would, perhaps somewhat more).

Fearless’ Take…

Ward settled into a third/fourth line role with the club last year.  It was a role perhaps not envisioned when he signed a four-year/$12 million contract in 2011, but he was at least as productive as one would expect from someone playing the role he was asked to play.  His eight goals in 39 games last year was his second best goals-per game (0.21) in his six-year career, just behind his 17 goals in 79 games (0.22/game) with Nashville in 2008-2009.  His 20 points in 39 games (0.51 points/game) was his career best, this despite his being seventh among forwards in total ice time per game and ninth at five-on-five.

Ward had solid, if unspectacular possession numbers.  He was fifth among Capital forwards in Corsi and relative Corsi at 5-on-5 (20 games minimum; source: behindthenet.ca), numbers which look better in light of his 44.8 percent offensive zone starts at 5-on-5.  His PDO value (sum of team shooting percentage and save percentage, on ice, at 5-on-5) was third among forwards, this after finishing first among forwards in 2011-2012 (minimum: 40 games).

Cheerless’ Take…

OK, about that production.  Buffalo, Carolina, Tampa Bay, and Florida were the bottom four finishers in the Eastern Conference.  Ward played 14 games against those four teams and went 6-9-15, plus-8.  In 25 games against everyone else he was 2-3-5, minus-1.  Against teams he will be playing against in the Metropolitan Division in 2013-2014 he was 2-3-5, minus-6 in 19 games (the Caps did not play against Columbus).

Then there was the fast start thing.  In 2013 he started 5-6-11, plus-7 in his first 14 games (a 29-35-64, plus-41 82-game pace), but then went 3-6-9, even, in his last 25 games (a 10-20-30, even pace over 82 games).  It was a lot like his 2011-2012 season where he went 4-3-7, plus-6 in his first 12 games (a 27-21-48, plus-41 pace) and 2-9-11, plus-6 in his last 61 games (a 3-12-15, plus-8 pace).

The Big Question… Where will Joel play?

This is a question that might have less to do with what Ward does and more what Adam Oates does.  More to the point, what Oates does with Eric Fehr.  So far this preseason Fehr has been getting time at center, moving from what one might have thought to be his spot on the right side of the third line.  If Oates sees this as a permanent fixture in the Caps’ lineup, it will open up the right wing spot on the third line for Ward.  Unless…

And this is where Ward might have some (perhaps limited, though) impact on where he sets up shop.  Moving Fehr to center opens up the right wing spot on the third line for Tom Wilson, too, who Oates seems to want on the roster to start the season.  Wilson and Ward would be fighting it out to see who plays where between the third and fourth lines, at least to start the season.

In the end…

Joel Ward had one of his best seasons in terms of offensive productivity last season despite the second lowest average ice time per game in his five full seasons in the NHL.  It would be hard for him to replicate those numbers, unless you think a 15.4 percent shooting percentage is sustainable.  Keep in mind that his career shooting percentage going into last season was 8.9 percent (it was 10.3 percent over his last 32 games last season).

Ward did, however, display versatility.  Among Capitals forwards with the team all season in 2013 he was one of only three forwards who averaged more than one minute of both power play and shorthanded ice time.  This was a large departure from his 2011-2012 experience when he averaged only 45 seconds of combined special teams ice time per game.

It is safe to say Ward is going to play on the right side… somewhere.  Where that is, is not entirely in his control.  Roster machinations – where Adam Oates decides to play Eric Fehr, whether George McPhee chooses to keep Tom Wilson on the roster (which would require another roster move to free salary cap space) – will be the moving parts that will go a long way to determine where Ward will play.

However, none of this seems likely to alter what Ward presents on the ice.  He will be an occasional contributor on offense (although it would be nice if it was more “occasional” as the season wears on than it has in his first two years in Washington).  He will work in all three zones digging out pucks.  He will be a solid, if unspectacular defensive player (he was 48^th among 395 NHL forwards in plus-minus per 60 minutes and 125^th among that same group in goals scored against per 60 minutes at 5-on-5). With all the ups and downs, with all the other stuff swirling around the forward lines, Ward has been steady as a rock.  It is an underappreciated quality.

Projection: 78 games, 11-15-26, plus-7

Photo: Bruce Bennett/Getty Images North America

Countdown to Opening Night by the Elements: Number 10

And now Fearless is down to the last ten elements to Opening Night.  It won’t be long now…

Neon

Neon is a noble gas that emits a bright red signature in the electromagnetic spectrum.  Born in fusion processes in stars, it is named for the Greek word, “neos,” meaning “new.”  As often as the word appears in conversation and print, it is actually a quite rare element, made even more so by the fact that is forms no stable chemical compounds. That makes it extremely volatile, allowing it to escape the earth in the heat of the young solar system.

It was discovered at the end of the 19^th century by Sir William Ramsey.  Having little else to do, apparently, Ramsey took a sample of air (it being in great supply) and chilled it.  I mean really chilled it.  So much that it became a liquid (for the record, that means taking it to a temperature of minus-319 degrees Fahrenheit).  Then he warmed it back up, slowly.  This allowed him to collect the gases comprising air as they boiled off, since each of them individually had different boiling points.  Nitrogen boiled off…oxygen…even argon.  Then, krypton (this guy would have been great building stills in the Appalachians).  He was left with a gas that gave off a brilliant red light when current was passed through it.  He named it “neon.”

Of all the noble gases, neon gives off the most intense light and is expressed as a red-orange color to the human eye.  These qualities make it a preferred element in lighting, displays, and it was important in the development of plasma television screen applications. 

Neon is not restricted to lighting or sign applications, although they are their most commonly known ones.  It is used in vacuum tubes, voltage indicators, and even lasers.  In its liquefied form it is used as a refrigerant.

We have an element born in stellar furnaces, but one that is apart from other elements on earth.  It shines brightest among them with an intense reddish glow.  And even though it is most commonly known as an element in lighting and in sign-making, it has a number of other applications.  It sounds like someone who is among the many elements of Caps Nation, but works apart from them (perhaps in his own booth), one whose intensity makes brighter and more memorable Caps game nights.  One who while most well-known here for his special talents on game night, has a lot of other credits to his name.

Neon… the “Wes Johnson” of the elements of the periodic table.

Countdown to Opening Night by the Elements: Number 11

Fearless got a bit behind his time and is late getting to number 11 in his waltz through the elements of the periodic table, but here he is anyway…

Sodium

Young chemistry students always seem to scratch their heads about this element.  How in heaven’s name does “Sodium” end up with the chemical symbol, “Na?”  It goes back to the discovery of the element.  Sir Humphry Davy was fooling around with electricity and caustic soda (what we know today to be sodium hydroxide).  He ended up with elemental sodium, and since it was derived from caustic soda, he thought, “well…soda…sodium.”  Not in those words (19^th century England being a time of much more flowery prose), but that’s the gist of it.

Ah, but not so fast.  We had a new element, but we did not have a chemical symbol for it.  Six years after Davy’s discovery, Swedish chemist Jöns Jakob Berzelius (you knew a Swede would show up sooner or later) got in the game.  Let’s follow along with this United Nations of naming process.  Berzelius (the Swede) took Davy’s discovery (he being the Englishman) and published a new system of atomic symbols in the “Annals of Philosophy,” a publication by Thomas Thomson (a Scottish chemist).  Among the symbols, Berzelius chose “Na” for sodium from the Latin word, “natrium,” which meant, well…”sodium.”

It was a lot of effort for what is a soft, silver-white, highly reactive metal that does not occur as a free metal in nature (it’s too reactive).  It does occur in a variety of compounds.  The aforementioned “caustic soda” – or “lye,” used in everything from soap-making to food preparation (the Scandanavian delicacy “lutefisk,” for example).  Sodium carbonate is used in glass manufacture.  Sodium peroxide is used to bleach wood pulp in paper manufacturing.  Sodium nitrate is used in fertilizers and in the manufacture of gunpowder.  Sodium nitrite is used to make dyes and acts as a corrosion inhibitor.  And of course, there is sodium chloride, which we know as common table salt.

In biology it acts as a fluid regulator, and important element in regulating blood pressure, blood volume, osmotic equilibrium (no net movement of fluid across membranes), and acidity.  In some plants it contributes to metabolism and regulates the uptake of water.

Sodium is one of those elements for which care must be taken in handling.  Exposed to air it will spontaneously react with water vapor to generate flammable hydrogen and sodium hydroxide – that caustic soda again.  In its powered form it will explode spontaneously in the presence of oxygen.  Moral…leave handling of sodium to the professionals.

So there it is, a common and very important element that can be found in nature in any number of important and useful combinations.  Discovered in Europe with a Swedish connection.  Reacts readily in the presence of water (maybe even ice).  Critical in life processes.  It might sound a bit like a center who, as a playmaker, reacts with a number of teammates to generate offense.  An important ingredient in any number of situations – 5-on-5, power play, penalty killing.  One from and discovered in Sweden.

Sodium… the “Nicklas Backstrom” of elements of the periodic table.

Countdown to Opening Night by the Elements: Number 12

Fearless seems to have an inexhaustible number of matches of elements of the periodic table to Washington Capitals.  What does he have for number 12?

Magnesium

When you go outside and look up into the trees on a spring day, you can see the green shoots of leaves emerging after a tree’s long winter slumber.  The green color you see, as any child learns in earth science class, is a product of “chlorophyll.”  It is a complex molecule that is essential to life on earth, allowing plants to absorb energy from light and convert it to chemical energy (photosynthesis).  Chemically, it is a long-chain molecule with a “chlorin ring” at one end.  At the center of this chlorin ring is a metal ion – Magnesium (strictly speaking Mg⁺⁺), which binds to nitrogen on either side of it.

Magnesium, at the heart of one of the most important naturally occurring chemicals on earth, and it is born in the superheated furnace of stars as the elements helium and neon are fused.  However, it is not found naturally on earth as a free element.  It can be produced as a free element, but in a process called “passivation,” it reacts in air to produce a thin oxide coating that renders it “passive.”  A good thing, too, because magnesium is an extremely reactive element.  It is one of the reasons you will find it in flares (do not stare into the light).

It shares a history with manganese, it being named for a region of Greece called “Magnesia.” 

Despite it being one of the lightest elements, it is a workhorse, even among the metals.  It is often used as a component in aluminum alloys, in iron and steel production (to remove sulfur), and in the production of titanium.  It has been used in aircraft (although it had a nasty habit of contributing to the ignition of engine crankcases in flight), race cars (mainly to reduce weight while maintaining structural strength), advanced consumer electronics (tablet devices, smart phones, cameras…again, for light weight, structural strength), water heaters (where it gives itself up to protect the vessel from corrosion), fertilizers, antacids, and laxatives.  In addition to its role in photosynthesis, it is present in the synthesis of chemicals involved in energy transfer, and it essential to nucleic acid chemistry, the manufacture of DNA and RNA in the body.

Magnesium… a chemical one pays little attention to, but one that is critical for the functioning of plant and animal organisms, one that shares a history with another, similarly named chemical, one that is an unsung workhorse among the elements.  Sounds like a guy who gets little attention but attends to the little things that help make a hockey team go, a player who shares a history with a teammate who is the Capital that most closely resembles that element with the similar history (the players shared a championship in Hershey in 2009 and 2010), a workhorse who plays the role of grinder and occasional pest.

Magnesium….the “Jay Beagle” of the elements of the periodic table.

Countdown to Opening Night by the Elements: Number 13

Lucky “13” of the elements Fearless is looking at?  Well…you be the judge.

Aluminum

Aluminum is a rather common metal, the most common one in the earth’s crust, as a matter of fact.  Ah, but try finding it as a metal in nature.  Probably not going to happen.  Aluminum is simply too reactive on its own.  But you can find it in more than 250 different minerals.  Despite its reactivity, it does not easily ignite.

It has a long history, its being in evidence in ancient Greece and Rome as an astringent (a “styptic” – an astringent used in treating wounds).  It would not be until the mid-18^th century that Louis-Bernard Guyton de Morveau, a French chemist and sometime political official, looked at “alum” (which is hydrated potassium aluminum sulfate, but they didn’t know that at the time, it was just this quartzy looking stuff) and decided to call it “alumine.” 

Close…but not quite.  Sir Humphry Davy figured out that there was a metal in there and called it “alumium.”  Ooooh…almost.  Davy took another shot at it, calling the metal “aluminum,” but he didn’t get around to actually extracting the metal.  Friedrich Wöhler, a German chemist, almost did it, but he thought he had potassium.  He tweaked his experimental processes a bit, and in 1827 he isolated pure aluminum. Bet this would have gone much more quickly if Swedes were involved.

But back to aluminum.  It is a very durable element, resistant to corrosion.  It has no known function in biology, but it does lend strength to metals with which it is alloyed, making it critical in aerospace, transportation, and structural applications. In fact, it is among the most practical of elements, finding its way into any number of applications or products: packaging (cans or foil), automobiles, building construction, utilities (light poles, sign posts), protection (casings for electronic equipment and consumer products), heat sinks for electronic appliances, paints, musical instruments (generally guitars), lighting, athletic equipment, fireworks, and many more.

Oh, and here is an odd fact about aluminum.  You find that in some countries (Great Britain, for example) the element is spelled “aluminium,” with the extra “I” imparting an extra syllable in pronunciation.  There is a reason for that.  There is this organization that serves as the authority on chemical nomenclature, the “International Union of Pure and Applied Chmistry (IUPAC, for short).”  After Davy proposed “aluminum” as the name for the metal, IUPAC decided that “aluminum” needed to conform to the naming conventions for elements, that they end in “ium.”  So, “aluminum” became “aluminium,” which is its official spelling to this day.  It was the Americans, being the rebellious sort they are, that changed the name back, the American Chemical Society doing the deed back in 1925.

So, there it is.  The strange history of its name aside, a widely found element that is durable, reactive if not readily ignitable, capable of lending strength to a wide variety of metal alloys.  It is not a flashy element, but rather one found in any number of useful, everyday applications and products. It is not unlike a hockey player who is sturdy, durable, plays hard in the corners and along the boards (although seldom fights…perhaps just one career fight, in fact).  A player who is a meat-and-potatoes sort who isn’t flashy, but can contribute at both ends of the ice.

Aluminum (or “Aluminium”)… the “Joel Ward” of the elements of the periodic table.

Countdown to Opening Night by the Elements: Number 14

Fourteen days left, fourteen elements.  Which Washington Capital will Fearless match to number 14?...

Silicon

Before it was an adjective that named a geographical feature in northern California (Silicon Valley), “silicon” was a common, garden variety element of the periodic table.  It is an element rarely found in its pure form in nature, but it is found in gobs of compounds (“gobs” being a common measurement in chemistry).  That’s what makes it the eighth most common element in the universe, by mass, and that allows one to find it in silica (dioxides of silicon), silicates, and of course…silicone.

As silica, it is found most often in glass, but it is also used in the production of optical fiber for telecommunications, and it is used in the production of porcelain and stoneware.  It is also used in food additives and for thermal protection.  It is used to get into tight places in hydraulic fracturing of geological formations to extract shale oil and gas.  It is used in toothpaste as an agent to remove dental plaque.

Silicates are the heavy lifters of the silicon family of substances.  It is what makes up sand and is, in fact, the single most common substance in the earth’s crust.  It is commonly used in what is referred to as “Portland cement, “ which is the most common type of cement, used in building applications (concrete, mortar, stucco) and in grout.

Silicones are synthetic compounds of silicon that have applications in both adhesives and lubricants, sealants and insulation, in cookware, dry-cleaning and in medical applications.

The establishment of silicon as an element brought out the big guns of chemistry in the 18^th and 19^th centuries.  Antoine Lavoisier of France, the “Father of Modern Chemistry;” Sir Humphry Davy of England, Louis Jacques Thénard and Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac of France.  None, however, were able to isolate it in its pure form.  That would be left to Jöns Jacob Berzelius of….TA-DA… Sweden, in 1823. 

The odd part of all that was that its discovery as a pure element came after it was named.  The somewhat unimaginatively named Thomas Thomson, a Scottish chemist, looked at it previous name – “silicium” – and decided it was not “metally” enough (we just made up that word).  In 1817 he dumped the “ium,” stuck on “on” (because it resembled boron and carbon), and voila!  “Silicon.”

What we have is a common element that has many applications in which it finds itself in tight places.  It can be a an abrasive or a lubricant.  It took a while for it to be established as a stand-alone element even though there had been a lot of work and speculation to establish it as such.  Sounds like a player who might often throw himself into tight places on the ice, who might be a bit abrasive and more inclined to throw his body around than his size would suggest, who might be shifty and slippery enough to escape harm, and who spent a long time establishing himself as an NHL player.

Silicon… the “Mathieu Perreault” of the elements of the periodic table.