Last week we said, “hockey is a funny game. Not often funny, ‘ha-ha,’ but funny, ‘strange.’ Week 20 was no exception. Although the Caps earned points in three of
four games and ended the week still in first place in the Metropolitan
Division, one had a sense of foreboding.
In the Era of Bettman, a .500 week in standings points earned can be accompanied
with three losses in four games. And
that is the week the Caps had, seeing their division lead dwindle to a single
thin point. Worse, the week ended with
what was arguably the worst game they played this season and the worst
performance in goal perhaps in the career of their number one netminder since
he took over that position, not that he had any support – any support this week
– in front of him.
Record: 1-1-2
Technically, in the way the league keeps score of such
things (standings points), it was not a losing week. The Caps did earn four points in four games,
three of them in three road games. Under
normal circumstances, three-in-three would not be a bad week on the road. This wasn’t normal. The Caps sandwiched ghastly, in different
ways, performances around a very good one.
What might be most noteworthy about the week, record-wise,
is the realization that there just might be something to this whole concept of
“regression to the mean.” Washington
lost two games in overtime this week, bringing their streak of overtime losses
to four, dating back to January 18th. This after starting the season 6-2 in extra
time games.
The strange part about the two overtime losses was that they
came in consecutive games. It has not
been unusual for the Caps. It was the
fourth time this season that the Caps played at least two consecutive games
into extra time (they had a three-game streak of such games in December).
The loss in regulation to the Chicago Blackhawks to end the
week brought the Caps’ total of regulation losses to 18, tying their total of
two years ago and closing to within one of their total of last season.
Offense: 3.25 /game (season: 3.09 /game, rank: 9th)
The Caps did not lack for offense, at least early in the
week. And overall, an average of 3.25
goals per game, their second straight week at or over that average, is top-five
level performance in the league this season (Boston was fifth at 3.27 goals per
game at week’s end). They did it efficiently,
scoring 13 goals on just 101 shots (12.9 percent shooting).
There was the good and the bad individually, though. On the good side, four Capitals registered
multi-goal weeks. Nicklas Backstrom and
Tom Wilson led the team with three goals apiece. Backstrom seems to have settled into a decent
goal scoring rhythm after struggling over much of the early part of the
season. He has goals in five of his last
seven games, four of them at even strength and one of them a game-winner. Finally getting to the 200-goal career mark
seems to have taken the shackles off.
Wilson’s achievement was more a marker in his developmental
arc. When he scored in the first period
against Chicago in the last game of the week, it was his tenth of the season,
the first time in his five-year career that he reached double-digits in goals
scored.
It was good to see Andre Burakovsky awaken, too. He has a pair of goals in the four games, the
pair coming in consecutive games against Winnipeg and Minnesota, the first time
this season he scored goals in consecutive games.
Alex Ovechkin had a strange week. On the one hand, he was the fourth Capital
with a multi-goal week, and he had the 24th game of his career with
four or more points when he recorded a goal and three assists in the 5-2 win
over Minnesota on Thursday. But in the
7-1 loss to the Chicago Blackhawks to end the week, he failed to record so much
as a single shot attempt, the first time in his 13-year career.
Defense: 4.50 / game (season: 2.98 /game, rank: 20th)
Shots allowed is going to sink this team. Twice in Week 20 the Caps allowed 44 shots on
goal – in the 4-3 overtime loss to Winnipeg and the 7-1 loss to Chicago. Those two games are the highest in shots on
goal allowed against the Caps this season, bringing the total to four the
number of games the Caps allowed 40 or more shots. They have a 1-1-2 record in those games, all
of them on the road. At weeks’ end, the
Caps allowed teams 35 or more shots 21 times.
Only five teams have had more instances, and of that group only the
Toronto Maple Leafs is playoff-eligible at the moment. This week, each game feature a single period
in which the opponent recorded at least 15 shots, the high of 21 coming in the
first period against Chicago to end the week.
In only four of 12 regulation periods did the Caps allow fewer than ten
shots.
Overall, the Caps were out-shot for the week, 151-101. How bad is that? The Arizona Coyotes, 31st in the
league standings, were out-shot by a 155-101 margin. Arizona is not a club the Caps want or can
afford to emulatre. It was almost as bad
in the shot attempts, where the Caps were out-attempted at 5-on-5 by a 206-149
margin, their minus-57 being the fifth worst number for the week, as was their
shot attempts-for percentage at fives (41.97 percent).
Goaltending: 4.44 / .881 (season: 2.84 / .912 / 1 shutout)
You could call this the worst week of the season for the
Caps in net, and you would not be far wrong, if you were wrong at all. Braden Holtby had what might have been his
worst week as a number one netminder in his career. Not that he had much support in front of him
(see the shot differential discussion above), but he was not above .900 in save
percentage in any of the regulation periods overall for the week (he played two
third periods and was .900 overall in those). You could say he is, if not in a serious
slump, then stuck in an inconsistent pattern.
In his last six appearances he is 2-2-2, 4.53, .884, and he allowed five
or more goals in three of those appearances.
Holtby’s struggles have inspired a new wave of the fans’
biggest pastime, calling for the backup to get more time or take over the
number one spot (with the number one guy getting traded). This is a staple of football fans and
quarterbacks, and it rears it head from time to time in hockey. The other side of this occasional distress is
the play of the backup, which has to be good to complete the thought. And Philipp Grubauer has been playing
well. In Week 20 he stopped 42 of 45
shots in limited duty (.933) earning the Caps’ only win of the week in the 5-2
victory in Minnesota. In his last dozen
appearances, Grubauer is 5-2-2 (three no-decisions), 1.86, .940, with one
shutout.
Power Play: 2-for-9 / 22.2 percent (season: 20.9 percent,
rank: 13th)
Another week, another plus-20 percent effort with the man
advantage. Over the last four week, the
Caps have been better than 20 percent in each week and are 9-for-31 overall
(29.0 percent). This was where the top
guys were the top guys, Nicklas Backstrom and Alex Ovechkin getting the two
power play goals for the week and earning three of the six points awarded. Ovechkin (1-1-2) and John Carlson (0-2-2)
were the multi-point players for the week. The hard part of this is the
opportunities. Nine power play chances
in four games put the Caps in the bottom third in the rankings overall for the
week. Only once in the last ten weeks
have the Caps finished a week with ten or more power play chances (13 in Week
15). While they rank in the middle third
of the league in power play chances overall this season (177/19th),
the lack of chances seems to be wasting one of, if not the most dangerous
offensive weapons that the Caps have.
Things were not quite as good as they seemed, though, and
there is an ominous quality to how the week progressed on the power play. The Caps were 2-for-3 in 3:57 of power play
time against Detroit to open the week, but they were 0-for-6 in 9:59 in power
play time over the last three games of the week, and they were held without so
much as a power play shot on goal in 2:44 with the man advantage in the 7-1
loss to Chicago to end the week.
Penalty Killing: 13-for-15 / 86.7 percent (season: 79.9
percent, rank: 18th)
The Caps did not lack for opportunities to practice their
penalty killing. The 15 shorthanded
situations they faced were more than the combined total of the previous two
weeks (12 in five games). It was the
most opportunities faced since Week 2, when they were shorthanded 17 times (the
Caps also were shorthanded 15 times in Week 7.
But here, too, things might not have been quite as good as
they seem. The Caps blanked Detroit and
Winnipeg on six chances over 12 minutes, allowing only ten shots on goal. Then, they stopped the first three power play
chances the Minnesota Wild had in the third game of the week. But the Caps allowed power play goals on two
of the last six shorthanded situations they faced for the week (one in the last
two the Wild had and one in four chances Chicago had). And, the Caps were shorthanded nine times in
the last two games, compared to six in the first two games.
Faceoffs: 118-for-244 / 48.4 percent (season: 50.3 percent,
rank: 16th)
This is an area in which the Caps have been slipping in
recent weeks. This week was an instance
in which the Caps were very good in one end and not so good in the other,
almost mirror images of one another. They
managed to win less than 40 percent of their offensive zone draws for the week
(27-for-71/38.0 percent), and no Capital taking more than one draw finished as
well as 50 percent. In the defensive
end, things were much better, the Caps finishing 58-for-96 (60.4 percent).
Individually, the big four (those taking at least ten draws
for the week) followed a similar profile – good in the defensive end, poor in
the offensive end. Jay Beagle was the
only one of that group to finish the week over 50 percent (57.9), perhaps a
function of taking 40 defensive end draws (winning 25) versus taking only nine
faceoffs in the offensive end (winning four).
That offensive zone-defensive zone split for Beagle was certainly
evident in the game against Winnipeg when Beagle took 18 defensive zone
faceoffs (winning 12) and only one in the offensive zone (winning that one).
Goals by Period:
Third periods were the story in Week 20, and it was not a
good one overall. Yes, the Caps did
score three third period goals to salvage a point in a 5-4 overtime loss to the
Detroit Red Wings in the first game of the week. However, the Caps gave up a pair of goals in
the last 10 minutes of the third period to give back that standings point in a
4-3 overtime loss to the Winnipeg Jets, they gave up a pair of third period
goals to the Minnesota Wild, and they played a lifeless third period after
falling behind the Chicago Blackhawks, 6-1, after two periods of what would be
a 7-1 loss to end the week.
It falls into a patter with this team, one of allowing more
goals as games go on. They have allowed
49 first period goals this season, 56 in the second period, and 62 third period
goals. And there are those two overtime
goals allowed this week that left the Caps with six overtime goals allowed this
season, tied for fifth-most in the league.
In the end…
One wonders, is this club in a slump, or is it expressing its
expected performance after overachieving for much of the season? Consider that the Caps won their first three
games of the new year, part of what would be a five-game winning streak. Since then, though, they are 6-5-4. There are 22 teams in the league with better
records over that span. If this is the
team the Caps really are, and their possession numbers certainly suggest they
might be (24th in the league in 5-on-5 shot attempts-for percentage), it
could be time for a reality check, that this team might be what we thought it
was when the season started, and not in a good way.
Three Stars:
- First Star: Tom Wilson (3-2-5, plus-2, nine shots on goal, 15 hits, five block shots)
- Second Star: Alex Ovechkin (2-5-7, minus-1, 15 shots on goal)
- Third Star: Nicklas Backstrom (3-1-4, minus-1)
No comments:
Post a Comment