Sunday, April 19, 2009

Eastern Conference Quarterfinals Game 2: Rangers 1 - Caps 0


It’s first to four, not first to two…

“They’re half way there, cuz.”

We know, Cheerless. We were there yesterday.

“Wasn’t pretty, was it?”

About as ugly as a 1-0 game gets…

“Whaddya mean, cuz?”

- New York Rangers…seven giveaways. Mike Green…seven giveaways. That’s all we’re going to say about Mike Green. We are not going to go all “Jeff Schultz” on him.

- Alex Ovechkin…five giveaways. Guys, it’s April, not Christmas.

- Ovechkin now has 44 shot attempts in two games ((18 shots on goal) and zero goals.

- We suspect much will be made of the fact that Alex Ovechkin didn’t get back in time to defend on the two-on-one break with Tom Poti back that resulted in Ryan Callahan’s goal – the only one of the game. But if you look at the shift times, Ovechkin was at the end of his shift, and if you rewind the play, you’ll note that the other defenseman was caught below the faceoff dots when the play started the other way – Mike Green. The Caps give up chances like this in the game they play.

“Cuz, you said…”

I know what I said.

- New York Rangers….24 shots on goal. Washington…24 missed shots.

- New York Rangers…24 missed shots and blocked shots, combined. Washington…24 missed shots.

- OK, so now we know why Bruce Boudreau is a Jack Adams winner, and we are…well, a Jack Daniels drinker. Simeon Varlamov got the nod and was brilliant. The kid deserved so much better in his NHL playoff debut.

- Henrik Lundqvist was better.

- Before the third period, we took note of the bird that was flying around the arena bowl. It landed in the crease that Henrik Lundqvist would occupy in the last frame. We were so hoping it would leave a present for him as a sign.

- The Caps look less focused in this series than they did in last year’s Flyers series. Losing to the Flyers last year was disappointing, but understandable…the clubs were very evenly matched. If the Caps lose this series, it will haunt them. They are a much better team. But the Rangers are flat out out-working them in the corners, along the boards, and in the high-traffic areas.

- On that last point, Mike Green summed it up…"A lot of shots were coming from the outside, but rebounds were coming into spots where we needed to be, but we weren't there." It seemed a case of timing and position as much as anything else. Rebounds looked as though they had eyes to avoid Capitals. A puck laying almost at Viktor Kozlov’s feet, but he was in too deep. Another puck that slid so tantalizingly up the slot away from Lundqvist that no Caps could reach.

- Coulda, woulda, shoulda…part of the problem is those shots coming from outside. Lundqvist is getting good looks at them…too good. The only shot that appeared to beat him cleanly was a third period rocket from Ovechkin from the slot that hit the crossbar and jumped into the screen over the glass.

This is the fifth time in Capitals history that they have lost the first two games of a playoff series. To date, they are 0-4 in those series, and in none of them did they manage to extend the series to as much as a sixth game (they’ve been swept twice and were ousted in five games twice). Here is the history (final results in parentheses)…

1990: Conference final against Boston (0-4)
1994: Conference Quarterfinals versus NY Rangers (1-4)
1998: Stanley Cup final versus Detroit (0-4)
2000 Conference Quarterfinal versus Pittsburgh (1-4)


But while it is said that less than 13 percent of teams falling behind 0-2 in games come back to win a series, that’s still about one-in-eight. That means that someone is likely to do it this spring. After all the ink and pixels devoted to Jose Theodore’s implosion, Henrik Lundqvist’s sublime play, this, that, and the other thing….the fact remains that these have been two one-goal games. It is not as if the Rangers have dominated., Larry Brooks and Stan Fischler aside. But the Rangers are up, 2-0, too. No time like now to make some history of a team sort. The individual stuff doesn’t matter anymore.

But Caps fans wake up today facing an uncomfortable possibility...that we've seen our last game at Verizon Center this year.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

The Peerless Prognosticator is ON THE AIR!!! -- Eastern Conference Quarterfinals, Caps vs. Rangers...Game 2

The Peerless Prognosticator is ON THE AIR!!!

It’s Game 2 of the Eastern Conference Quarterfinals this afternoon as the Capitals host the Rangers, and it promises to be a good one. The teams…

“Hey, Peerless, how ya doin’? How ya doin’?”

Rodney! Long time, no see, pal. What have you been up to?

“Well, I’ll tell ya, I’ve been watching that goaltender of yours, Jose Theodore, and I’ll tell ya….I thought I got no respect. I’ll bet Theodore’s parents gave him a toaster and a radio as bath toys when he was a kid.”

That’s a little harsh, don’t you think, Rodney?

“Are you kiddin’? In his family tree, he’s the sap!”

Well, I’m not sure…

“C’mon, he’d probably go to a sports psychologist and say everyone hates him…and the doc would say ‘you’re bein’ ridiculous…everyone hasn’t seen you play yet.’”

At least he still has his looks.

“Are you kiddin’? As a kid, he was so ugly his mother fed him with a sling shot…and he still couldn’t catch anything.”

Sounds like a rough childhood.

“Yeah…but I heard a Caps fan sent him an invitation to join a bridge club…yeah, next Tuesday he’s supposed to jump off the Woodrow Wilson Bridge.”

Hope it’s not at rush hour.

“And when he parks his car over at Kettler to go to practice, fans follow him around with a pooper-scooper.”

Well, that’s Arlington for you…

“He was sick about the game the other night and went to his doctor…he said, ‘doc, I look in the mirror, and I feel like throwing up. What’s wrong?’ The doctor said, ‘I don’t know, but your eyesight is perfect.’”

Well, that’s a good thing for a goaltender.

“Are you kiddin’? He gets no respect. On the team plane, after they have their meal, they make him do the dishes.”

It can’t be that bad.

“Yeah?...when he was a kid, he had a yo-yo…it never came back.”

Well, it could be worse.

"How?...when he was a kid, he was told he had to start at the bottom.”

Well, a lot of folks get that lesson.

“He was taking swimming lessons.”

Yikes!

“Yeah, and when he was getting started in hockey and wanted to go on the ice at the lake, he was told, “not now, wait ‘til it gets warmer.’”

That’s a tough way to learn hockey.

“It’s no better now…at his house, when the dog barks, it doesn’t want to go for a walk, it wants Theodore to leave.”

So what do you think, Rodney…does he have a big game in him today?

“I tell ya, I got a lotta respect for a guy who doesn’t get any respect, ya know what I mean?”

I think I do, Rodney. I think I do.

Caps 4 – Rangers 1

Friday, April 17, 2009

We're Blinding You...With Science!


By now you've read a fair number of essays and tables expounding on the matter of what a team's chances are in winning, losing, or splitting games 1 and 2, especially the importance of Game 2.

OK, fine. So...how have the Caps done in their history of frustration and despair in the playoffs in Games 1 and 2, and how has this translated into series won and lost?

Here is how the Caps break down, by Game 1 and Game 2 results, and the number of series wins and losses in each category...

Win Game 1/Win Game 2: 3 series won/3 series lost

W/L: 3-10

L/W: 4-2

L/L: 0-4

If the Caps win Game 2 tomorrow, you'd like their chances, based on their history. But, should they lose...

No pressure guys, eh?

A Thousand or so Words About the Goaltender


Goaltenders are an odd lot. It is a position that doesn’t have a parallel in any major sport.

In baseball, catchers are probably the closest to that of hockey goaltender, but they participate in – and are expected to contribute to – the offensive side of the game. Goaltenders are (Martin Brodeur notwithstanding) generally disinclined to participate in starting plays, and they are prohibited by the rules from even crossing into offensive territory.

In football, place kickers are the first thing that comes to mind for their unitasking responsibility (kick oblate spheroids between uprights) and for their occasionally off-center personalities. But kickers might step onto the field, at most, a half dozen times a game to display their talents (between kicking extra points and field goals). Goaltenders are expected to stop 30 or more shots a game and might see an opponent attempt 50 or more. And, goaltenders are often identified as the key in big games. We don’t see a lot of ink devoted to Shaun Swisham being the key to the Redskins’ fortunes on any given Sunday. “Important?” Yes…”key?” No.

In basketball, nothing comes to mind that comes close to mirroring the unique characteristics of the position of hockey goaltender. You might stretch things to include a Dennis Rodman when he played in the NBA – a unitasker of a sort with his single-minded talent for rebounding. And, he certainly fit the “off-center” personality thing. But that’s a reach, too, and there isn’t anyone else, or any position, that makes one think, “yeah, that’s like a hockey goaltender.”

The uniqueness of the position sets the hockey goaltender apart, not only from other positions on the ice, but in a sense from his own teammates. It might be the mystery of the position or the lack of a common frame of reference between skaters and goaltenders, but one gets the feeling that in a lot of NHL locker rooms, the goaltender is somehow “different.” No less of a teammate, certainly, but someone whose idiosyncracies, personality quirks, superstitions, and routines might be curiosities and characteristics to be accepted by teammates at a discrete distance.

We suspect this applies to coaches as well. It just seems in reading and listening to coaches in the NHL talk about their own goalies from time to time that they often struggle with just how to relate to their goaltender. And that goes both ways. When Glen Hanlon – a former goaltender himself – was coaching the Caps, and after he was relieved, we remember the occasional quote from former Caps goalie Olaf Kolzig suggesting that Hanlon “got it” with respect to dealing with goalies. Well, we’d expect him to.

What all this is prelude to is that Coach Bruce Boudreau has a big decision facing him before Game 2 on Saturday. He’s been mum about it, even if he’s made it. And that decision is whether to pull Jose Theodore after a disappointing performance in Game 1 in favor of rookie Simeon Varlamov in an effort to improve the performance in goal and perhaps give his team a jolt. When you think of the expectations surrounding this team, the specter of huge disappointment if the Caps should not advance beyond this round, a national television audience watching, and a home crowd getting antsy (already) about their Caps, this has the makings of being the biggest coaching decision in Boudreau’s tenure with the club.

If there is any coach in the NHL who would have to make that decision (Scotty Bowman having retired), I can’t think of one better equipped to make it than Boudreau. He’s seen it all, in every corner of North American hockey. He’s coached teams that exceeded expectations, and he’s coached teams that have perhaps fallen short. He’s been in a 0-1 hole in playoff series before, like the AHL Calder Cup final in 2006, which his Hershey Bears came back to win.

But he still has to contend with the unique nature of the position and psyche of the incumbent holding it when making that decision, because that decision affects both the incumbent (How does he take it? Can he rebound if called back to the ice?) and the replacement (Is he ready? Have we prepared him well enough? Is this the right time?). While he makes that decision for skaters as well, there is the fact that there is only one goaltender (and only one “number one” goaltender, by definition) and all the attention centered on the position.

Game 2 is the most important game the Caps will have played, to date, this year. One could argue it is the most important game they've played since losing a triple-overtime game, and playoff series, to Tampa Bay in 2003. If they lose, they stand only the slimmest of chances of advancing past the first round. And, a good portion of the good will that comes with being the upstart young kids making good could be lost – another in a history of underachieveing outcomes for the Capitals.

Which direction the Caps will take rests largely on the decision on who is in goal tomorrow. This isn’t to say that whatever decision is made, this series will turn into a goaltending duel. We still believe that Henrik Lundqvist is objectively a better goaltender than either of the choices the Caps have. Lundqvist is, in our opinion, one of the top three goaltenders in the league, so he’s going to win a lot of those comparisions.

The goaltender backstopping the Caps has to make all of the saves he should and almost all of them he shouldn’t. For the skaters, their job is not to be so irresponsible or not to lose such focus in their system that they put their goalie in the position of facing the task of making a lot of saves he shouldn’t. That’s on the players to keep this from becoming a goaltending duel.

As for the decision, we suspect Coach Boudreau is going to turn once more to Jose Theodore, a goalie who has shown no small measure of resiliency in coming back from bad performances this year, even against this opponent. We’re not going to be a Monday morning bench coach. We’ll state right now that we think it would be the correct decision.

Meanwhile...


...in Philadelphia last night:

The Bears knocked off the Phantoms, 4-2, in Game 1 of the AHL East Division semifinals. They finished strong, scoring three goals in the third period for the win.

Michal Neuvirth turned aside 30 of 32 shots for Hershey (Caps fans will no doubt clamor for him to be called up to start Game 2 in Washington, tomorrow).

The scoring was led by the kids. Of the under-25 brigade to get on the scoreboard...

Kyle Wilson: 1-1-2, +1 (first star)
Andrew Gordon: 1-1-2, +1 (second star)
Oskar Osala: 1-0-1, +1
Jay Beagle: 1-0-1, even
Chris Bourque: 0-1-1, even
Francois Bouchard: 0-1-1, +1
Andrew Joudrey: 0-1-1, +1
Mathieu Perreault: 0-1-1, even

And, Karl Alzner was a plus-2, helping hold the Phantoms to an 0-for-7 performance on the power play.

Game 2 is in Philadelphia tomorrow.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

On the other hand...

...since the Caps defeated Buffalo in Game 2 of the 1998 Eastern Conference finals, the Caps are 4-13 on home ice in the playoffs.

Isn't home ice supposed to be, like...an advantage?

Return with us now to those thrilling days of yesteryear...

...From out of the past come the thundering slapshots of the men in red. The Washington Capitals skate again!

OK, so this isn't The Lone Ranger. But we will, for a moment, look back to yesteryear and to another series that started in Verizon Center, two games that kicked off the Eastern Conference quarterfinals...

The Capitals split two games against a sturdy goaltender (2.24 GAA, .914 save percentage for the year while pitching six shuouts and winning 30 games), the loss -- coincidentally enough -- by a 4-3 margin.

After splitting those first two games at home, the Caps went on the road and swept their opponent in their rink. The adventure wasn't over, though ...the Caps came home and lost -- again -- at home. But then they went on the road once more and won the game and the series.

The opponent...the Boston Bruins

The goalie...Byron Dafoe

The year...1998.

You remember what happened that year, don't you?

OK, the Caps don't have Olaf Kolzig standing on his head in goal like they did then. But then again, that team didn't have Alex Ovechkin, either.

Even if you want to go back further -- to 1988 and what a lot of Caps fans think is the signature playoff series in franchise history -- the Caps lost game 1 to the Flyers at home in the Patrick Division semifinals. They went down 3-1 in games after losing both games in Philadelphia. But then they pounded the Flyers in two games before setting up a Game 7 -- where they found themselves in a 3-0 hole. The Caps came back to finish the game like this...“…Murphy starts the rush… he hits Hunter…he’s in alone…a shot…and a goal!!!!!"

The point is, there are many minutes to play and many shifts to skate before this series is over. Who knows where they will lead?

Eastern Quarterfinals Game 1: Rangers 4 - Caps 3


It’s first to “four,” not first to “one.”

It’s first to “four,” not first to “one.”


Repeat after me… it’s first to “four,” not first to “one.”

Hey, Peerless? It’s also a three-period game, not a one-period game.

OK, ya got me there. If you’d have told me that after the first period the Caps: a) out-shot the Rangers 14-4, b) out-hit them 16-11, and c) won 11 of 15 draws, I’d have told you that the Caps: a) led after one period, b) had the Rangers on their heels, and c) had the crowd really into it.

The fact is, the game was scoreless after one period, the Rangers started to shift the momentum at the end of the period, and the crowd wasn’t quite as over the top as we might have expected.

That hits statistic is especially revealing. After tenderizing the Rangers relentlessly and remorselessly for 20 minutes, the Caps… stopped. And that was a metaphor for the whole evening as the Rangers ended up spotting the Caps a goal before winning Game 1, 4-3 last night.

After the Caps put up those 16 hits in the first 20 minutes, they registered only 11 for the last 40 minutes of the contest. And that was merely a reflection of the comparative listlessness that the Caps displayed in letting the Rangers off the hook.

Much will be made of the fact that Jose Theodore allowed four goals on 21 shots – certainly the fan reaction on the post-game radio show indicated that Theodore was, at best, the worst goaltender ever to have strapped on pads in the history of earth. But Theodore suffered from two things last night, neither of which were in his control. First, he is listed – generously, we think – at 5’11”. Why is that important? Because the Rangers did a good job of picking corners over his shoulders. The second Ranger goal by Nik Antropov and the game-winner from Brandon Dubinsky were scored in that fashion.

Second, despite the Rangers getting only 21 shots, the Caps did not play a very good game of team defense in front of Theodore. What unfolded was precisely the sort of thing that was described in many pre-game reviews of this series – the Caps spent such a portion of their effort on the attack that it leaves the goaltender having to face good scoring chances from the opponent frequently. Markus Naslund’s goal could fall into that category, as could Dubinsky’s, for that matter.

We won’t argue that Theodore played a good game – he didn’t, and he admitted as much in the post-game. But he didn’t get a lot of support in front of him at crucial moments, either.

Which brings us – speaking of that support in front of him – to Jeff Schultz. There probably isn’t a person in the Washngton metro area who feels worse about what happened on the Dubinsky game-winner than Schultz. Small consolation. He took a bad angle on Dubinsky, fell when Dubinsky cut back against the grain, and could only watch as Dubinsky skated in with Markus Naslund and only Mike Green back. Dubinsky picked the top corner, and that was that.

Then there was the fourth goal, which was actually the first of the night for the Rangers. If you only saw the end of the play, you might ask, “how is it that Scott Gomez got so open to skate in alone on Theodore?” Well, rewind the tape. What you’ll see is that Sean Avery set a moving pick on Mike Green at the Capitals’ blue line to spring Gomez free. What we don’t understand about the play, though, is what Shaone Morrisonn was doing at the end of it. He slid across the crease to try to deny Gomez a shot, but failed – or didn’t seem to attempt – to poke the puck off Gomez’ stick. He slid completely out of the play, allowing Gomez to cut across and stuff the puck behind Theodore.

Other stuff…

- 13 shots, 28 attempts, six hits, three takeaways, and a two assists (after originally being credited with a goal that ultimately went to Tomas Fleischmann). Alex Ovechkin had a very full evening.

- 46-20 on draws. You can’t do much better against air. Perhaps more than in any game this year, the Caps did a fine job of tying up the center on the draw and having a teammate come in and control the puck.

- Two power play goals for New York…two power play goals for Washington. If the Rangers equal the Caps scoring on the power play, this is not going to end well for the Caps. For it is there that the Rangers, well, suck, and the Caps can – and have to – make Henrik Lundqvist pay.

- Yes, we get it. Lundqvist is a better goalie than Jose Theodore. The object of the exercise for the Caps was, and will continue to be, not letting this get into a goaltender battle. They can’t give up chances in their end (they did), and they have to convert the chances they get at the other end, generally by getting second shots and traffic.

- Which brings us to what is too often the most frustrating thing about this team. They get so cute on the power play, it is as if they are trying to one-up one another to see who can make the prettiest pass, when what is called for is to pound the puck into the crease and go after it. That is how Alexander Semin scored his goal on the power play last night, and you could argue that it is how Tomas Flesichmann – setting up as a screen in front of Lundqvist as Ovechkin took a drive – scored his power play goal. If the Caps are going to spin the puck around the perimeter and go for that one last cross-ice pass that seems always to be deflected by an opponent’s stick, then it’s golf in May.

- For all the talk of Marc Staal and Dan Girardi drawing Ovechkin duty, it didn’t last long (Staal ended up being on the ice for all three Caps goals). The Rangers ended up sending Wade Redden and Michal Roszival out there. That didn’t really help much either. Ovechkin was the best player (at least the best one not wearing goalie pads) on the ice.

- It took 22 games, but Viktor Kozlov finally got his first career playoff goal off a positively brilliant pass from Nicklas Backstrom.

- Mike Green had two assists, but he was also on the ice for three Ranger goals and took a delay-of-game penalty. We’re thinking he got his bad game out of the way in this one.

- Here is an ominous statistic for you Caps fans hoping for a Cup this year. In the last ten seasons, the record of the Stanley Cup winner in Game 1 of the first round?... 8-2.

Stan Fischler is already rolling out the “S” word with respect to this series, and Larry Brooks is working the Lundqvist-over-Theodore angle this morning. Fine. What the Rangers did was pop the Caps in the nose. But it’s still first to four, not first to one.

Repeat after me…”it’s first to ‘four,’ not first to ‘one.’”



Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Your Peerless Prognostos for Round One


EASTERN CONFERNCE

Boston Bruins (1) vs. Montreal Canadiens (8)

Why Boston will win

In both the parts and in the whole, Boston is ranked higher (read: ”is better”) – goals/game (ranked 2nd versus Montreal’s 13th), goals allowed/game (1st versus 21st), five-on-five (1st/17th), power play (4th/13th), penalty kill (ok, they’re tied at 11th), and of course…standings (1st/8th). They have seven individual players with at least 50 points, Montreal has three. They have seven players with at least 20 goals, Montreal has…three. The Bruins’ backup goalie – Manny Fernandez – has a better GAA and save percentage than does the Canadiens' starter (Carey Price, for now). It’s not, “why Boston will win,” but “will Montreal win a game?”

Why Montreal will win

It’s all too easy. Besides, the Canadiens have won the last three playoff series contested between these teams. And there is that 100th anniversary thing, too. OK, we’re reaching.

Who will win? Boston in three. OK, four.


Washington Capitals (2) vs. New York Rangers (7)

We’ve covered this already…twice.


New Jersey Devils (3) vs. Carolina Hurricanes (6)

Why New Jersey will win

Martin Brodeur (well, the one to whom we have become accustomed, not the one who lost six in a row to close March and open April), an unrelenting devotion to a “system” of hockey, and the good sense not to employ a pig as a mascot.

Why Carolina will win

They’re hotter’n a barbecue in Joo-ly. They won their first four games in March and haven’t let up much since – 13-3-2 to close the year, and not a Gimmick win in the bunch (they did have two Gimmick losses). Six of the 13 wins were by at least three goals. They averaged 3.89 goals a game in the 18 games from March 1st onward.

Who will win? Carolina in six, even if “Old Marty” shows up.


Pittsburgh Penguins (4) vs. Philadelphia Flyers (5)

Why Pittsburgh will win.


The Evgeni Malkin who scored 113 points this year, the Dan Bylsma who coached ‘em up to a 18-3-4 record after he took over for Michel Therrien behind the Penguin bench, the Sergei Gonchar who had 19 points in 25 games (including five power play goals) after returning from a shoulder injury, the Chris Kunitz who was just the shot in the arm the Penguins needed.

Why Philadelphia will win

The Evgeni Malkin who finished last season’s playoffs so silently, the Dan Bylsma who has never coached so much as an AHL playoff game (let alone an NHL brand), the Sergei Gonchar who is prone to the inopportune turnover, the Chris Kunitz who is the third leading scorer for the Penguins with just 53 points for Anaheim and the Penguins. The Flyers are more of a known commodity – you know what you’ll get from night to night…balanced scoring, grit, a “won’t quit” attitude, and yes, even iffy goaltending. There are too many moving parts that are unknowns for Pittsburgh.

Who will win? Pittsburgh in seven, crushing the Flyers on the basis of the advantage the Flyers gave away in the regular season finale – home ice.


WESTERN CONFERENCE

San Jose Sharks (1) vs. Anaheim Ducks (8)

Why San Jose will win


All that stuff we said about Boston? It applies here, too.

Why Anaheim will win

They’re better than Montreal, especially in that their young goalie (Jonas Hiller) played a lot better than Montreal’s young goalie (Carey Price) this year.

Who will win? San Jose in six…we give the Ducks one game on Hiller’s stealing it, another on pride, but the Sharks are too deep, too talented, and too good.


Detroit Red Wings (2) vs. Columbus Blue Jackets (7)

Why Detroit will win


It’s not the age, it’s the mileage. And the Red Wings have seen so much more over the miles than have the Blue Jackets, playing in the franchise’s first playoff series (nice way to start, eh boys?). Chris Osgood won’t steal a game as long as the Red Wings play this spring, but it’s even money that the Blue Jackets will get within a time zone of testing him with the defensive abilities the Red Wings can deploy against what is already an offense-challenged team.

Why Columbus will win

The Red Wings, last year notwithstanding, have a disturbing history of looking ahead and having it spank them. And, who’s to say Steve Mason can’t pitch four shutouts?

Who will win? Detroit in five…there are two shutouts in the season series between these teams, and Columbus doesn’t have either of them.


Vancouver Canucks (3) vs. St. Louis Blues (6)

Why Vancouver will win


Because maybe the Blues will just be happy to have made it, seeing as how they were seven games under .500 as late as January 13th. That, and the Canucks have Roberto Luongo, who somebody owes at least a series win to after he had a 1.77 GAA in last year’s playoffs and still only got to the second round.

Why St. Louis will win

Because Vancouver finished third only because Calgary didn’t win consecutive games after March 5th. The Canucks might be over-seeded relative to their abilities. The Blues also had the best finishing kick in the entire league (8-1-1 in their last ten games), and goalie Chris Mason finished with a rush (9-1-1, 2.09, .924).

Who will win? Vancouver in seven…it’ll be the battle of Luongo’s curious history of misfortune and Mason’s only having one unfortunate playoff series worth of experience (1-4, 3.45, .901 with Nashville in 2006).


Chicago Blackhawks (4) vs. Calgary Flames (5)

Why Chicago will win


They got their ship righted. After an 0-3-2 stretch in mid-March, they finished the year 9-2-1, including back-to-back wins over the Red Wings to close the season that might not have been the highest priority for the Wings (say, below “stay healthy”), but were probably a real confidence-booster for the young Blackhawks. And, they seem to have finally settled on a goalie – Nikolai Khabibulin. His career record against Calgary? 22-5-2, 2.06, .931.

Why Calgary will win

This will be the first playoff appearance for the Blackhawks since 2001-2002; the Flames have been in the last four years before this one. After a six game goal-less streak, Jarome Iginla finished up the regular season with four in his last seven games.

Who will win? Chicago in six…Calgary has been off for a while now – they were 9-12-3 from March 1st on, Miikka Kiprusoff lost six of his last nine decisions (and hasn’t had all that great a year anyway), and Iginla is minus-9 against the Blackhawks in four games this year…what’s up with that?

As always, don't use these picks for actual cash wagers, but do tip your wait staff...

Getting in touch with his inner Druce

Over on Japers Rink, there is the question that has to be asked of the Caps in this series, Who could be this year's John Druce? It's a fair question (The Peerless said in a moment of homophonic foreshadowing). We just think that the choices offered as an answer to the question -- Keith Aucoin, David Steckel, Boyd Gordon, and Matt Bradley -- miss the obvious.

Let's go back for a moment to Druce and how it was that he was so unexpected a star in the 1990 playoffs. In 1990, Druce had just completed his second regular season with the Caps. His resume, as those playoffs began, included 93 regular season games, in which he was 16-10-26, and one playoff game, in which he did not register a point. In spite of the fact that Druce had once put up 22 goals in 49 games for Peterborough in Canadian juniors and 32 goals for the Binghamton Whalers in the AHL, you wouldn't have pegged the then 23-year old to end up finishing second in the 1990 playoffs in goals scored - he had 14 (in 15 games) to Edmonton's Craig Simpson's 16 (in 22 games).

So, if you're looking down the Caps' roster, and you want to find a young guy -- 23 or so -- who has shown some goal scoring potential in the past, who has had some experience with the Caps in the regular season, but not too much, and who hasn't yet had a lot of highlights in his budding career, who might you find to fill the bill?

Hmm...let's see...

Druce had 93 games experience heading into his star turn, this guy has 109.

Druce had 16 career goals to that point, this guy has 15.

Druce had one playoff game of experience, this guy has five games of playoff experience.

Druce went the Canadian juniors-AHL-NHL route, and so did this guy.

Druce was 23 years old, this guy is...23 years old.

If you're looking for a Cap for whom the stars are aligned to get in touch with his inner Druce, it just might be this guy...


Programming Note

JJ over at Tic Tac Toe Hockey is calling on all Caps fans to come up with a fight song. It is something desperately needed -- the meat between the slices of bread that are the horn-horn-horn and voice-voice-voice of the Caps sandwich of cheerleading. And, it being a contest, there is a prize involved.

So put on your thinking caps...there have to be some budding lyricists out there somewhere. Even if it's just "what I'd like to do to Sidney, is punch him in the kidney."

So, like JJ says... "Get on it!"

Top Ten Excuses President Obama Will Use Not to Attend a Caps Game

The Boss reports that he had the pleasure of meeting President Barack Obama at Georgetown University yesterday, and he took the opportunity to invite the Leader of the Free World to a Caps game.

As intriguing as the idea sounds (and one we've pondered as well), we're just not getting that "hockey guy" vibe with the President. We even suspect there are any number of excuses he could use to decline the invitation. We've compiled such a "top ten" list...

Top Ten Excuses Barack Obama Will Use Not to Attend a Caps Game...

10. Michelle doesn't have anything to wear

9. We couldn't find a dog sitter on such short notice

8. I have to stay home and figure out my 2010 NCAA brackets

7. That's the night Putin's sleeping over

6. Malia is allergic to hockey

5. It's on my to-do list...right after "fight two wars," "save the global economy," "provide health insurance to every American," "implement green energy policies," "get the American car industry back on its feet," "restore our banking system to health," and "pick up a bag of IAMS for Bo."

4. I don't need to go see Sean Avery...I have to deal with Rahm Emanuel every day.

3. The Presidential Limousine is in the shop and won't be out until Tuesday

2. You've sold out all your games, and the Secret Service guys couldn't get tickets.

...and the number one excuse Barack Obama will use not to attend a Caps game:

1. Sorry, but I have a strict rule about watching sports with no balls.

The Peerless Prognosticator is ON THE AIR!!! -- Eastern Conference Quarterfinals, Game 1: Caps vs. Rangers

The Peerless Prognosticator is ON THE AIR!!!

We’re finally here. A clean sheet of ice, everybody starting off 0-0, and hope in the air in 16 cities across North America. You’ve read the blogs, you’ve perused the pundits on line. Everyone has weighed in with their take on round one as we head into tonight’s action.

Well, not quite everyone. We still haven’t heard from two of the sharpest hockey minds around. Cheerless? Fearless? You guys ready to make your picks?

"Who’s playin’?"

Cheerless, where have you been? Caps…Rangers…playoffs.

"Oh, I thought you were talkin’ about the draft lottery. How ‘bout them Islanders? I got ‘em takin’ Blake Griffin with that first pick. He’s just the forward they need."

"Cuz, he’s a basketball player."

"So? It’s the Islanders we’re talkin’ about."

Guys?...The game tonight? Who are the keys to the game…Fearless?

"I’m looking at Scott Gomez. In each of the last four years, he’s averaged at least a point a game in the playoffs. And in his last 30 playoff games, he has 13 goals. If the Rangers can get that kind of production out of him, they have a pretty good chance in this series."

Cheerless?

"Markus Naslund. Since March 1st, he’s only got seven points – four goals, three assists – and he had to get a point in each of his last three games to finish with that many. He had a couple of pretty good playoff runs with Vancouver, but last year he had only five points in 12 games. They’re not payin’ him four million bucks to be Chad LaRose."

What about the defense? We’re reading a lot about Marc Staal and Dan Girardi against Alex Ovechkin. Fearless, you think that will benefit the Rangers?

“I’m more interested in who the Rangers match against the Laich-Fedorov-Semin line. Guess we’re going to find out if Derek Morris is all that.”

“Hey, cuz…did you know Dan Girardi is -14? Worst on the team?”

“Cheerless, Colton Orr is -15.”

“Yeah, like he’s getting a sweater.”

“He’s played in all 82 games this year.”

“Really?“

“It just seems like he hasn’t because he only gets six-and-a-half minutes a game. 532 minutes for the year.”

“About a game and a half’s worth for Mike Green.”

Guys? What about the coaches. John Tortorella has a Stanley Cup on his resume.

"Yeah, and he’s also 8-14 in the other three years he’s been in the playoffs. I’m not seeing anyone named 'Lecavalier' wearing a blue jersey."

“Or ‘St. Louis.’”

“Do they make Ranger jersey’s in toddler sizes?”

OK, OK. How about the goalies? The Rangers have the clear edge here, right?

"You know? For all the talk about Jose Theodore being this and that and the 2009 equivalent of Michel Belhumeur, he did win 32 games in 57 appearances this year. And, he has a better career playoff save percentage than the other guy (.914 to .907)."

"You’re reachin’ cuz…Henrik Lundqvist had a pretty brutal rookie playoff experience, but he’s been solid the last two years."

"Yeah, and he’s still barely got a better save percentage compared to Theodore’s career number (.917 - .914)."

"Well cuz, here are a couple o’ lines about the goalies against playoff teams in the East for you…

Goalie 1: 14-3-4, 2.61, .912
Goalie 2: 15-14-1, 2.90, .903


…Which is which? "


Cheerless, for a drooling idiot, you're not bad with numbers.

"Thanks, cuz....HEY!"

OK, guys...There’s still that whole “can the Rangers stop Ovechkin” thing…well, can they?

"That might not be the Russian for the Rangers to be concerned about. You have to figure that Ovechkin is going to get his points somehow. But the wild card might be Sergei Fedorov. He played in only one game against the Rangers this year, but he is 10-25-35, +21, in 27 career games against New York."

"Hey cuz…the Russians seem to like playing the Rangers. Ovechkin, Semin, Fedorov, and Viktor Kozlov have 101 career games among them, and they are 33-58-91, +25 against the Rangers with six game winners, eight power play goals, and four shorties."

OK guys, who do you have? Fearless?

"The Caps score more, their goalie has been better against top-flight competition this year, they’re deeper. They win."

Cheerless?

"Shoot, cuz, even I can’t get all depressed about this one. They have the best player. They probably have the best four skaters in this series – Ovechkin, Semin, Backstrom, and Mike ‘Goal a Game’ Green (he’s got three in three games against the Rangers this year)."

There are two parallel schools of thought about this series among those who think the Rangers will win. First, Jose Theodore is a slug. The fact is, he has been at times this year, but not generally against the better teams, like those he’ll face in the playoffs. The other is that the Rangers have so utterly transformed themselves – picking up Nik Antropov, Derek Morris, and Sean Avery on the ice and John Tortorella behind the bench – that the Rangers are a much more formidable team. Well, gee…if those players were so sure fire all stars, how is it they got traded? And as a side bar, does this word association cause you to blow a gasket?...”Nik Antropov” … “saviour.”

We think the pundits have relied on something of a herd mentality in evaluating the goalies. This “inconsistency” meme that has dogged Theodore needs to be evaluated in terms of how he’s actually played against talented teams. And his record is better than Lundqvist’s this year against those teams – better GAA, better save percentage, and most important, better win-loss record.

The Rangers could win this series. Stranger things have happened (the 2002-2003 Red Wings – a 110 point team – were swept out of the first round by Anaheim, for example). But the Caps have the best player (like Cheerless said, probably the best four skaters), they have a goalie getting less credit than he merits, and frankly we think they have the better coach.

On paper, this isn’t a close series. It won’t be on the ice, either. And it starts tonight…

Caps 4 – Rangers 2

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

So, Prognosto Boy...How Did You Do?

Now that we have our 16 contestants for the Stanley Cup playoffs, it’s time to ask, “how did we do in prognosticating them?”


All in all, not too bad. We were correct in picking six of the eight playoff teams in the East and five of the eight in the West. The East turned out to be a real crap shoot, as seven teams were separated in the end by only eight points in the four through ten spots. If Buffalo hadn’t missed Ryan Miller for five weeks to an ankle injury (during which the Sabres went 5-7-2, including a loss to the Rangers (who finished only four points ahead of Buffalo), we suspect we’d have hit on seven of eight in the East.

Looking at the East, one can see that a lot of prognosticators – those less “peerless” – suffer the same problem each year. And that is, they seem to think that the team that spends the most “Stoopid Bucks” is going to be a winner. This year’s prize goes to all those prognosticators out there who thought Tampa Bay, which didn’t so much make a splash as they did start a tsunami of stoopid spending, was going to be a winner. The added Ryan Malone, Mark Recchi, Gary Roberts. They drafted Steven Stamkos. They put Barry Melrose behind the bench. And Tampa was going to challenge for the playoffs. The only thing they challenged was in finding heretofore undiscovered ways to lose games in extra time (5-18 in a whopping 23 extra time games).

We didn’t foresee Boston becoming so much more than the sum of their parts. They had pieces, and we count ourselves among those who constantly underestimate the unusual goaltender stylings of Tim Thomas. But they proved us wrong; they were no fluke.

We missed on Ottawa because we didn’t appreciate how much of a mess this team was once you got past their top line. And even they didn’t have an especially good year, not by their standards in recent years. They are the team that has seen their opportunity pass, and they might have to blow things up in order to compete in a few years.

In the West, our picks weren’t quite as bad as one might think at first glance. For example, we said of Colorado…
“There isn’t a lot of room for error…As it is, they are probably on the wrong edge of the playoff mix. Any injuries or bad stretches, and they’re sunk.”

Well, injuries they had, and it sank them.

We missed on Dallas because for the simple reason that Marty Turco forgot how to play goaltender. His start was too big a hole for a team with a defense-first mentality to climb out of. In the first month alone, Turco allowed five or more goals four times in nine appearances. He was a little better in November, allowing five goals three times in 12 appearances, but that sort of production killed whatever chance the Stars had this year. They made a bit of a push in January and February, but then sank, perhaps running out of gas trying to make up for that poor start.

Columbus had a history of failure, never having made the playoffs in their history. But we – and we suspect, everyone else – never saw Steve Mason coming. He is the reason we missed on Columbus and is the reason Columbus is preparing for a playoff series today. As for St. Louis, we just whiffed on that one, although for the sake of four points, we might have been right on Minnesota and on St. Louis. Minnesota was 1-3-0 against the Blues this year.

The big miss, though, was in not picking Vancouver to make the playoffs. We wondered if a team that finished the 2007-2008 season 23rd in scoring, 18th on the power play, and 25th when trailing first had enough oomph to help Roberto Luongo win a few games. Clearly, they did.

The Peerless Prognosticator is ON THE AIR!!! -- Your First Round Prognostications: Caps vs. Rangers

The Peerless Prognosticator is ON THE AIR!!!

The Caps will face the New York Rangers in the first round of the 2008-2009 playoffs that starts this week. On paper, the Caps should dispose of the Rangers in short order. Now it’s time to look at why they will…or won’t.

As much as any series in the first round, this one’s theme will be the irresistible force meeting the immovable object. The Capitals are a top-third ranked team in the offensive statistics and have the fire power to spot a team a lead and come back to win as often as not. On the other hand, the Rangers are a top-third ranked team in the defensive statistics and boast the league’s top penalty killing group. The raw numbers look like this…


If one digs a little deeper into this goop, you can start to see things each team wants to take advantage of, and things they'd like to avoid...


What you find here is that the Caps are a team that starts fast and finishes that way, illustrated by their league's second best first and third period goal scoring. That third period scoring might be something to watch here, given that the chinks in the Rangers' defensive armor seem to appear later in games.

There is also the matter of the Caps being almost a third-of-a-goal a game better than the Rangers at five-on-five. This appears to be a reflection of the Rangers' overall lack of offensive depth and the Caps ability -- even willingness -- to trade haymakers with teams. The Caps have more weapons for that sort of a contest. How the Rangers deal with that -- or how the officials do (more on that in a bit) -- will be a significant factor in this series.

Now, if you read the collective hockey punditry, you will find a common theme, that being that you can throw these numbers out, that with the addition of Sean Avery, Nik Antropov, and Derek Morris – none of whom have played against the Caps this year while wearing a Ranger jersey – plus the fact that John Tortorella (not Tom Renney) coaches this team now, the Rangers are a different team. In a sense, they’d better be, since the Caps won seven of a possible eight standings points in the head to head competition, and the Rangers won no games in the “hockey” portion of the series (winning their only point by virtue of coming out on top in the Gimmick in the last meeting of the teams, on February 11th).

But are the Rangers a different team after all those changes? The dividing line we might look at to answer that question is the trading deadline, since it is at that point that the Rangers had all the new ingredients – coach and players – in place to effect this supposed phoenix-like transformation. Here is how the Rangers break down, before and after…


Clearly, the Rangers performed better after the additions, not so much on special teams, where their efficiency didn’t change appreciably, but in 5-on-5 play. They scored more and allowed fewer goals. But we have a suspicion that in an odd way, that will mean that this series will turn on special teams. Bear with us.

Even with the improvements, the Rangers are not an especially fearsome team at 5-on-5 play. So, for the Rangers, the object might be to “shorten” the game – play fewer minutes at 5-on-5, let the superior penalty killing unit frustrate the opponent, and/or score on the power play by virtue of getting more chances.

With that in mind, here is the single number you might keep in mind when watching this series…

Five.

Look at that second table above, the one that includes a reference to the teams' record when receiving five or more power plays/PK situations a game. When the Rangers received five or more power plays this year, they compiled a record of 24-8-1. Even when having to kill off five or more penalties, they had a .500-plus record (13-10-2). And when the Rangers were in a tightly-called game all around – five or more power plays for both teams – they were 9-3-0 (although three wins came via the Gimmick). If this series turns into a march to the penalty box, it will not be good news for the Caps, especially given that the Caps averaged just over five minor penalties taken per game for the season.

A tightly called series for both teams is a high risk proposition for the Rangers, given the effectiveness displayed by the Caps on the power play this year – at 25.2 percent, they were second in the league to Detroit. That means that for all the attention being paid to who is in the Capitals’ net, the Rangers’ only chance to win this series, it would seem, is for Henrik Lundqvist to keep the Caps at bay until the Rangers can generate just enough opportunities to scratch out a goal or two.

And again, for all the pixels and ink being devoted to how inconsistent Capitals’ goalie Jose Theodore is, there is a curious history about Lundqvist in the playoffs. Namely, he hasn’t been that good, at least not as good as one might expect a three-time Vezina finalist to be. In 23 career playoff appearances, Lundqvist is 11-12, 2.57, .907, all numbers being significantly inferior to his career regular season record. Seven times in those 23 career playoff appearances he has allowed four or more goals, including three times in his last eight outings in last year’s playoffs.

If there is something in the Rangers’ season record that could cause concern among Caps fans, it is in their ability to frustrate offensively gifted teams. Of the top five goal-scoring teams in the NHL this season, the Rangers have a record of 9-6-2. They have a .500-or-better record (based on points earned) against four of those teams. The one team they do not have a .500 record against – the Caps (1-2-1).

How the Rangers will win

Stan Fischler’s faith in the Rangers’ offense delivering aside, the Rangers have to keep games from getting past six goals combined for the teams. If games get to seven, eight, nine goals, chances are the Rangers aren’t going to be on the long end of them. They don’t have enough weapons to consistently win high-scoring games.

The Rangers’ realm is the one-goal game. No team still playing in the East has played in more one-goal games than have the Rangers (43). Only New Jersey among playoff teams in the East has more one-goal wins in the regular season. On the other hand, no team in the East played fewer one-goal games in the regular season than the Caps (34), although the Caps’ winning percentage is virtually identical to that of the Rangers (.559 to .558). The Rangers need to win games 2-1 and 3-2. They won’t win games, 5-4 or 6-5.

You’d like to think Scott Gomez and Chris Drury are going to show up for the Rangers. Their respective playoff pedigrees suggest that they will. But that isn’t likely to be enough. The Rangers need Nikolai Zherdev and Nik Antropov to show up, too. The problem is, Antropov has a grand total of five points in 28 career playoff games, and Zherdev is making his first playoff appearance.

The wild card – literally – is Sean Avery. There is perhaps no player in the NHL who has such an outsized reputation as a game changer relative to his actual production. But that’s the problem, too. That reputation, which centers mostly on his antics directed toward opponents, disguises a resume that suggests a productive player. He had 22 points in 41 games this year, 12 in 18 games for the Rangers. That’s not a total that will impress folks who watch the Caps treat the scoreboard like a pinball machine, but 0.67 points/game for the Blueshirts is better than Markus Naslund or Brandon Dubinsky put up this year, too. Avery’s ability to contribute within the rules can’t be overlooked.

How the Caps will win

What the Caps are going to want to do is make this “Showtime” in the NHL sense. The Rangers had the worst winning percentage of any of the remaining 16 teams in games decided by three or more goals (8-14, .364). This is the fault line upon which this series will be decided – the ability of the Caps to impose a fast-break style on the Rangers, pounding them with their superior offensive depth, or the Rangers making this a war of attrition, shortening the game by virtue of their suffocating penalty kill and goaltending.

The constants for the Caps are Alex Ovechkin and Nicklas Backstrom. Ovechkin has had consecutive games without a point only twice this year, and none since early January. Backstrom endured a four-game streak without a point in late January, but since then has registered at least one point in 27 of 33 games. Then there is Mike Green, who in the last two years has gone 5-3-8, +6 in seven games against the Rangers.

The wild cards are Alexander Semin and Brooks Laich. While Semin has matured as a player, he is still given to bouts of inconsistency. But in his last 22 games to close the regular season, he was 13-16-29 with three game-winning goals. If that Alexander Semin shows up – the one of sublime talent who, when he is on, is the most gifted offensive talent on this team – this will be a short series. For Brooks Laich, it is not likely to be so much a matter of talent as will. When Laich is rooting around the crease for a puck like a pig after a truffle, he is the perfect complement to the other talent on this team. In his last 16 games, Laich was 8-9-17. Maybe for the duration, that should be our nickname for him – “Truffles.”

Like most playoff series, we think this will turn on goaltending. The hockey “market,” in a sense, has already factored in the alleged inconsistency of Jose Theodore and has tagged the Caps as the most vulnerable favorite in the first round. Our suspicions are about Lundqvist, who has had more problems in playoff settings than one might expect.

The Rangers won’t score enough to keep them alive into a second round, and Lundqvist doesn’t have four sub-three goal games in him.

Caps in five



Monday, April 13, 2009

Four by Four

This morning, 16 teams have dreams of winning 16 games. Only one team will do it, the other 15 becoming a fading afterthought as time goes by. The idea of “16” is what appears in the calendar on the right, a nod to what is the ultimate objective here.

But that’s not how things are done in the playoffs, or how they will be done over the next nine weeks. The temptation to think about “16” obscures the fact that a team can win the Stanley Cup only through the simple isometry of winning four, four times. And in that there is a guide to keep you, dear reader, from losing sleep over the fortunes of your favorite team.

Somewhere along the line, teams will stumble, even that team that will win the ultimate prize. Fans will furrow their brows and gnash their teeth with every goal allowed, every loss their team endures. A loss in game one, or even game two will no doubt inspire wails of despair that all is lost.

It would do well for fans to remember, it’s not first to “one,” it’s first to “four.” It is only in the latter that a team can advance to the next opportunity to win four games. Do it four times, and you get to skate around the rink with a trophy that will no doubt seem light as a feather.

However, if your team loses one game, or two, take solace in the fact that to get to “16,” the object is to get to “four”…four times.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

A NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP Night -- Boston 4 - Miami 3 (OT)


We did not see the Caps drop a 7-4 decision to the Florida Panthers last night. Except for sorting out the final statistics, there is one thing to take away from that game. Looking back at the last twenty Stanley Cup winners, those teams’ combined record in the regular season finale…

8-9-3

That is the very definition of meaningless.

What we did do last night was see, in 71 minutes and 47 seconds, everything there is to offer in college hockey. We could say that Boston University and Miami University put on a game for the ages, but was it really any more exciting than the 2007 final when Michigan State scored with 18.9 seconds left to steal a championship from Boston College, or when the championship game went to overtime in five of seven years from 1996 through 2002, or when Bowling Green went to four overtimes to defeat Minnesota in 1984?

Well, maybe. It was almost a case of a cliché unfolding before one’s eyes as the heavily favored Boston University Terriers broke on top with a late first period goal from Chris Connelly, but watched the lead disappear when Gary Steffes pounced on a loose puck early in the second. Then, the RedHawks – the David that hadn’t won a championship in, well, anything – slung two rocks at the Goliath of Boston University. Tommy Wingels and Trent Vogelhuber scored 3:21 apart late in the third to put themselves on the carpet to accept the national championship trophy.

But they never got their hands on it. BU pulled the goalie with three and a half minutes remaining, pulling out all the stops to get the two goals needed to keep the game going. They got the first when Zach Cohen picked up a loose puck and backhanded it from a difficult angle under the right arm of RedHawk goalie Cody Reichard. Then, Matt Gilroy showed why he is this year’s Hobey Baker Award winner. Chris Higgins circled with the puck at the near wall and sent a pass to the high slot to Gilroy. In one motion, Gilroy collected the pass, pulled the puck around a Miami defender, and slid it to Nick Bonino at the right wing faceoff dot. With Reichard unable to close the gap left on his glove hand, Bonino rifled the puck into the back of the net with 17.4 seconds remaining to send the game into overtime.

To the credit of both teams, neither played it safe in the overtime that followed, and what that suggested was that it would take an odd bounce or an unexpected deflection to settle the matter. What happened was a goaltender’s worst nightmare. As the clock was ticking toward 12 minutes in the first overtime, Kevin Shattenkirk dropped the puck for Colby Cohen at the left point. A seam opened between two Miami defenders, and Cohen took a step in. As he wound up to take a slap shot, events unfolded that bore an uncanny resemblance to events any Caps fan of long standing will remember.

Roll back to an April night in 1996 and a playoff game between the Capitals and the Penguins that inched its way late into a fourth overtime… The Penguins were on a power play, and Sergei Zubov sent a pass across to Petr Nedved at the left wing point. Nedved walked in to the top of the circle with Caps defenseman Mark Tinordi blocking his path. Nedved was patient enough to let Tinordi make his move, which was to go down to the ice to block a shot that didn’t come. Nedved stepped around Tinordi and sent as harmless looking a shot as there was in this game toward Kolzig. He never saw it. The seeing-eye puck avoided several players screening Kolzig and fluttered over Kolzig’s left shoulder into the back of the net to win the game.

And so the nightmare unfolded for Miami’s freshman goaltender. Cohen stepped in and took the shot. Redhawk defenseman Kevin Roeder dropped to block the shot, something he has probably done countless times as a player. But what probably never happened in all those instances was the puck hitting his leg and tumbling into the air. For a goaltender, the worst nightmare imaginable is to be tracking the puck, following it off the stick of a shooter, and then – it’s gone. Where is it?!

It is as helpless a feeling as there is – a goaltender becoming frozen in place, hoping the puck he can’t see hits him somewhere, anywhere. Reichard was frozen in his defensive position waiting to feel rubber hit padding somewhere. But what he didn’t know, 18,000 people were watching in slow motion…the puck tumbling slowly, lazily through the air toward the Redhawk net. The only clue Reichard would have of where the puck was would be the next sound he’d hear – a whoosh of “ooohs” from the crowd for a puck that barely slid by the open net, or a roar of celebration.

As the puck tumbled unseen over his left shoulder and settled softly behind him in the net, he heard that roar. And it was coming from the other end of the ice, where the Boston University faithful were celebrating the fifth hockey championship in the school’s history.

Truth be told, Boston was bigger, stronger, faster than the RedHawks. There were times in the game – late in the third period being one –when the Terriers looked like a passable NHL prospect team that could give lower rung NHL teams a run for their money. But my, how those RedHawks worked. Not one of them took a shift off. They skated with, badgered, harassed, and simply willed themselves to compete with BU. If ever it could be said of a team that “they left it all on the ice,” it could be said of the Red Hawks. For long stretches, you could almost see the thought bubbles over the heads of the BU players…”don’t these guys know we’re better?” Miami didn’t care.

But fate isn’t sentimental. Miami was the underdog’s choice and, it seemed, the crowd favorite. Unfortunately for Miami and their fans, they had 59 minutes and 42 seconds of fight in them. While they fought gamely after the tying goal with 17.4 seconds left, one had the feeling that it would take a stroke of luck for this underdog to win. And tonight, that stroke of luck wore the wrong shade of red.

Caps fans shouldn’t be surprised though…that winning goal, coming as it did in such an unexpected fashion, came at the same end of the ice where Joffrey Lupul ended the Caps season last year, when Cristobal Huet lived his own nightmare of not being able to find a puck that was out there somewhere.

photo: Toni L. Sandys-The Washington Post

Saturday, April 11, 2009

The Peerless Prognosticator is ON THE AIR!!! -- Caps vs. Panthers, April 11th

The Peerless Prognosticator is ON THE AIR!!!


The invitations are out, we just need to know the dance partners now. All 16 teams for the playoffs have been identified – Anaheim and St. Louis locking up the last two spots in the West. For our purposes, we just wait to see whether the Capitals will face either the Montreal Canadiens or the New York Rangers in round one. And in the waiting, there is one more game left to be played, that against the Florida Panthers. It hardly matters who the opponent is, the focus here is on staying healthy, getting focused, and addressing some last-minute issues. And as such, the focus tonight is on the Caps and how it is they are finishing up the regular season.

Wins. The Caps have 50, which ties a franchise record set by the 1985-1986 team. There was no Gimmick in the day, but that 1985-1986 team did play in ten overtime games. That team compiled a record of 3-0-7 in those games (ties being the outcome if neither team scored in overtime). This year’s edition of the Caps has played in 18 extra time games, of which nine have gone to the Gimmick. In those games the Caps are 4-5. If those games were to have ended in ties, as was the case in the 1980’s, the Caps would have 46 wins, not 50. And, the current team would have compiled that number of wins in 81 games (tonight being game 82), not 80 games, as was the case in 1985-1986. Still, even under the 1985-1986 rules for determining outcomes, this team stands to finish with the second highest number of standings points in a season (by our reckoning, a win in regulation or overtime would allow this team to finish with 103 points under the old rule).

Goals (team). The Caps have scored 264 goals as we enter the season’s final game. That is good for third in the league in goals per game (3.26). The Caps cannot catch Detroit for the top spot (the Wings have 287 goals, 3.59/game), but with a big night tonight and a dry weekend for Boston, they could catch the Bruins (3.29 per game through 80 games). The 264 goals the Caps have is the highest number for a Capitals team since the 1993-1994 season (277), and it falls well short of the 315 scored by that 1985-1986 team. But here is where we are really talking about not only different eras, but in a sense different games. The mid-1980’s was the Wild West era of the sport, a lawless (seven Caps had more than 100 PIMS, and that wasn’t thought of as a goonish team), no-holds-barred sort of era where goal scoring in bunches was a nightly affair.

Four Caps on that 1985-1986 team had at least 30 goals (Dave Christian, Mike Gartner, Alan Haworth and Craig Laughlin). Three more had at least 20 (Bengt Gustafsson, Larry Murphy, and Bob Carpenter). The current team has a total of five players with at least 20, although one would have to include Alex Ovechkin, Alexander Semin, and Mike Green among the most dangerous goal scorers at their respective positions in the current NHL. One might not have had the same fear – relatively speaking – of a Haworth or a Laughlin, who were better known as two-thirds of the “Plumbers Line” in the 1980’s.

Goals (player). Alex Ovechkin won’t catch Dennis Maruk’s 60 goals in 1981-1982 again this year, but his 55 entering game 82 dwarfs that of the Caps leading total from 1985-1986 – Dave Christian’s 41 goals. It would be hard to overstate the degree to which Ovechkin is the dominant goal scorer of his era, even as he lowers the curtain on only his fourth season. He will lead the league in goal scoring for the second straight year (he has not finished lower than fourth in any of his four seasons). He has topped 50 goals for the third time in four years. For the second straight year, he could finish at least ten goals ahead of his nearest competitor (the Flyers’ Jeff Carter is ten behind). For the second straight year, he could finish with at least 20 percent more goals than his nearest competitor (he has 22 percent more goals than Carter). Here is perhaps the most amazing part of this and another reflection of his amazing consistency. Since enduring a slow start to the season – two goals in his first 11 games – he has been on precisely a 65-goal pace, that being the number he finished with last season. If there is one area in which the 1985-1986 team has no answer, it is to Ovechkin. But the same could be said about the league’s relationship to Ovechkin as well.

Assists (player). Until last year, one could make a case that one of the best home-grown playmaking centers in Caps history was Bengt Gustafsson (yes, we know he played in the old WHA, but he played for no other NHL team but the Caps). Gustafsson certainly was the key set-up man for that 1985-1986 team, finishing that year with 52 assists in 70 games. But second-year center Nicklas Backstrom has already obliterated that total, having registered 64 assists through 81 games. If he gets two tonight, he will take over the third spot on the all-time Capitals single season assist rankings, passing Michal Pivonka (65 in 1995-1996). If he has a really big night – five assists – he will tie Adam Oates for second (69 in 2000-2001). We’re guessing he doesn’t have a 12-assist game in him, which he would have to have to catch Dennis Maruk’s 76 assists in 1981-1982. But next year…

Power Play. If there is one area in which the 1985-1986 and 2008-2009 Capitals teams are virtually identical, this is it, as this table shows…


But while the goals scored and opportunities are just about equal, this version of the Caps team is much more dominating than their 1985-1986 counterparts. In that year, if you can believe this, only three of 20 teams failed to hit on at least 20 percent of their power play opportunities, although Edmonton – which led the league with a 26.4 percent success rate – wasn’t much more successful than this year’s leader, Detroit (25.7 percent) or even this year’s Caps. That explains why the Caps of 1985-1986 finished 9th on the power play in effectiveness, while this year’s club challenges for the top spot. What is also similar is the two clubs' comparative inability to draw enough penalties to make their power plays even more fearsome. Both ranked in the lower half of opportunities drawn.

Even the individual breakdowns look similar. Both the 1985-1986 team and 2008-2009 team had one dominant power play goal scorer (Christian then, with 18, and Ovechkin now, with 19), and had two other players with at least ten. The difference between the teams is Mike Green. Mike Gartner had 11 power play goals for second most on the team, and no defenseman had more than ten (Larry Murphy had eight). Green has 18 power play goals, and counting. That puts him in a tie for seventh most for a season in Caps history. Ovechkin hold three of the top six totals and could tie his own franchise record (shared with Peter Bondra) if he gets three power play goals tonight.

Penalty killing. If the two clubs of different eras are almost identical in terms of power play success, then they are very different when shorthanded…


There are similarities in terms of success rates, but again, the differences in the eras means that an 80 percent success rate gets you in the top ten in 1985-1986, while a similar success rate puts you in the bottom half of the rankings this year. The real difference here, though, is responsibility. Even accounting for the comparatively more free-wheeling style (and physicality) of the 1980’s, the current Caps team is a good deal more irresponsible than their 1985-1986 counterparts. Being tied for the second most number of power play opportunities allowed (with Philadelphia) is playing with fire.

Goaltending. Again, the teams are reflections of entirely different eras with respect to goaltending. Both the 1985-1986 and 2008-2009 teams have dressed four goaltenders. However, where the Caps of 1985-1986 had no goalie with at least a .900 save percentage, this year’s Caps have three. Even Michal Neuvirth, who falls below the line at .892, would have led the 1985-1986 Caps in that measure (unless you count Bob Mason’s saving all five of the shots he faced that year). Only Neuvirth has a goals-against average of at least 3.00 (he has exactly that). All four Caps goalies from 1985-1986 exceeded that mark, and the man the Caps traded for that year to shore up what was thought to be iffy goaltending – Pete Peeters (traded with then Caps back-up goalie Pat Riggin) – had a GAA of 3.35 as a Cap. If there is one common thread between the two teams, it is a subjective one…does the goaltending talent and consistency match that of the skaters on the club?

In 1985-1986, oddly enough, the goaltending ended up not being the problem in the playoffs, even in the second round, when the Caps fell in six games to the heavy underdog New York Rangers. Peeters allowed 20 goals in six games, roughly consistent with his regular season performance with the Caps. But the skaters managed only 25 in the six games against John Vanbiesbrouck and Glen Hanlon, only three in the last two games of the series, both of which the Caps lost.

This year’s concerns focus on whether Jose Theodore – more clearly the number one goalie over the course of the regular season than any goalie the Caps had in 1985-1986 – has what it takes to lead the club far in the playoffs. But if the 1985-1986 club has a lesson to teach, it is as much that the skaters have to help their goalie by doing their share to give him a chance to help them win. That will bear watching after the final horn sounds in Florida tonight.

The Peerless’ Players to Ponder (and other stuff)

We usually look at one player for each team for the game, but here, we’ll look at how certain Caps are carrying themselves into the last regular season game…

The Young Guns: Alex Ovechkin, Alexander Semin, Mike Green, Nicklas Backstrom

Ovechkin is in the position of needing an herculean performance against the Panthers to overtake Evgeni Malkin of the Penguins for the Art Ross trophy. No matter…Ovechkin is closing with a rush, whether he catches Malkin or not. In his last ten games, Ovechkin is 6-13-19, +1. If anything, he’s closing faster – on the offensive side of the ice – than he did last year, when he was 8-5-13 in his last ten games. But last year, he was +10 in those last ten games, which suggests that he does have an eye on both catching Malkin and perhaps getting 60 goals. He won’t get the latter and likely won’t get the former, so maybe now he can just settle into playing the game at both ends, instead of loitering (or so the current school of thought seems to be in a lot of hockey corners) waiting to spring on the offensive.

Semin, on the other hand, is dealing with a slump in his last ten games, if you compare those ten with his previous ten. From February 24th through March 14th, Semin went 7-9-16 in ten games. In ten games since, he is 3-4-7. Perhaps a bit more ominously, in the whole 20-game set, he is -4, and this is a player who is tied for the team lead in plus-minus this year. His last ten games look a lot like his last ten games last year (5-1-6, -3), which was then followed by going 3-5-8, +2 in seven playoff games. Like Ovechkin, he seems to be playing without a focus the last few games, but certainly his past performance suggests he has it in him to lift his game.

Green is the record setter this year that Ovechkin was last year, but after setting a record for consecutive games with a goal by a defenseman, he went into a slump – 1-7-8, -4 over his next 13 games. But starting with a two point night against Carolina on March 14th, Green is 8-7-15, +2 in his last 11 games. Perhaps more important for him, given the time on ice he chews up each night, he is even or better in each of his last seven games. It is quite different from last year, when Green was more the set-up man from the blue line, going 1-9-10, +8 in his last ten games of the regular season.

Backstrom is poised to take his place – if not now, in only his second season, then soon – as the best playmaker in the history of the franchise. Backstrom is fifth in the league in assists, ahead of such renowned playmakers as Marc Savard and Joe Thornton. If he can have a big night tonight against Florida, he could leap over Ryan Getzlaf and Pavel Datsyuk into third in the rankings, behind the duo from Pittsburgh of Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby. He is 3-9-12, +5 in his last ten games, which is entirely consistent with the way he wrapped up last season, in which he was 3-7-10, +7 in his last ten games.

The Next Wave…

One could say that the first four players – those “young guns” – are a given. It would be surprising if they performed at a significantly lower level of production than their regular season output. Let’s put it this way, if they do, the rest of this conversation is irrelevant, because the Caps won’t get past round one. But it is in the next wave where the ultimate fortunes of the club might lie. And there, the focus is on the group of Brooks Laich, Viktor Kozlov, Tomas Fleischmann, and Sergei Fedorov.

As a group, they are 12-16-28, -1 in their last ten games. It isn’t a lot different, scoring wise, from how they finished last season (7-21-29). But this group was a combined +10 last year. The difference is the production of Viktor Kozlov, who finished the 2007-2008 season +9 in his last ten games, but is even in his last ten entering tonight’s game. Another difference – on the good side – is the way Brooks Laich is ramping up for the playoffs. He has five goals in his last ten games on the way to a 5-7-12 scoring line. Last year at this time, he was also finishing strong, going 2-6-8 in his last ten. We don’t think it is a coincidence that in those 20 games, in which Laich has gone 7-13-20, the Caps have gone 16-2-2.

Wild Cards…

Two players who did not figure heavily in the end game of the 2007-2008 regular season or the playoffs could be important this time around. Michael Nylander sat out the end of the season after shoulder surgery, and Eric Fehr was a support player averaging less than ten minutes a night in the last ten games of the year and the seven game playoff loss to the Flyers. More might be expected this time around. Combined, they are only 3-5-8, even, in their last ten games. However, Fehr has shown glimpses of the goal-scorer he can be, and he is also a diligent forechecker – an important ingredient to the Caps’ game of pursuit and puck control. Nylander is having a nightmarish season in which he could finish with the lowest point total of his career in seasons with at least 50 games played since that of his rookie season with Hartford in 1992-1993. But Nylander’s career record also reflects an ability to contribute at the offensive end, having reached the 60-point mark in five seasons since 2000-2001.

Defense and Goaltending…

The way the Caps are constructed and play their game, the object of the exercise is for games not to come down to defense and goaltending. It is a style that worked for Tampa Bay in 2003-2004 and for Carolina in 2005-2006 in winning Stanley Cup. As was the case with those teams, defense and goaltending need only be competent – they cannot give up easy goals, turn the puck over carelessly, or allow the Stay-Puft marshmallow goal. In the last ten games, the Caps have allowed 27 goals (Gimmicks don’t count). One would like that number lower heading into the playoffs, but keep in mind, too, that the Caps are 7-1-2 in those ten games. If Caps fans have to take that goals-against record, but they can have that record, too, well…I suspect it is a bargain that will be accepted eagerly.

What the Caps are going to have to guard against, if the regular season is a guide, is things coming too easily early. The Caps have a +13 mark (goals scored to goals allowed) in the first period this year. They have scored more first period goals than everyone except Boston, with which they are tied (85). However, they have only a +3 mark in the second period. Caps fans might have an idea about this that doesn’t bear up under the numbers.

Fans might think the Caps are more porous on defense in the second period of games, but in fact have allowed the eighth (tied with Florida) fewest number of second period goals in the league. But of the seven teams ahead of them, all of them are in the playoffs. What might be of greater concern is how they score in the second period. Only ten teams have scored fewer second period goals, and of that group, two (the offensively challenged Rangers and Blue Jackets) are in the playoffs. Seems as if the minds of the young guys tend to wander when things go well early.

We’ll probably have more to say about such things as we get closer to game one of the first round, but there are some things here to think about as the Caps wrap up the 2008-2009 regular season and head on into the second season. As for records, we don’t think Ovechkin will hit 60 or catch Malkin, although we do have a feeling about Backstrom jumping over Getzlaf and Datsyuk in the assist race. And Jose Theodore will match a career high in wins, while Tomas Fleischmann does reach that 20-goal mark…

Caps 5 – Panthers 4

Friday, April 10, 2009

Rock the Red...Squared


Your national championship finalists in NCAA Men's Ice Hockey, University of Miami (Ohio) and Boston University



It's a Red, Red World...

Big Weekend in Chocolatetown


As the Caps are wrapping up their regular season, so too are the Hershey Bears. And unlike the Caps, who know where they will finish, the Bears are still in a fight for the top spot in the East Division. Five teams are fighting for the four playoff spots available...



And here is how the schedule for the weekend breaks out...

Hershey

Friday: at Philadelphia (7-1-2 against the Phantoms)
Saturday: Philadelphia (6-1-3)
Sunday: Wilkes-Barre Scranton (4-3-2)

Bridgeport

Friday: Springfield (2-0-1)
Saturday: Lowell (4-1-0)
Sunday: no game (season complete)

Wilkes-Barre/Scranton

Friday: Albany (5-2-0)
Saturday: Norfolk (4-1-2)
Sunday: at Hershey (5-3-1)

Philadelphia

Friday: Hershey (3-6-1)
Saturday: at Hershey (3-6-1)
Sunday: no game (season complete)

Binghamton

Friday: Norfolk (3-4-0)
Saturday: at Albany (3-3-1)
Sunday: no game (season complete)

The Hershey/Philadelphia home-and-home has a lot of subplots. Leave out he fact that they are within spitting distance of one another. The Phantoms are bringing down the curtain on The Spectrum tonight. Then again, the Bears have not lost in regulation to the Phantoms in The Spectrum this year (4-0-1). On the other hand, Philly is tied with Binghamton in points for the last playoff spot, and they hold the tie breaker of more wins.

Hershey having the game in hand on Bridgeport is huge heading into the weekend, but that game in hand could be a showdown with the Penguins. Here is a scenario for you...

- Hershey splits with Philadelphia
- Bridgeport sweeps Springfield and Lowell
- Wilkes-Barre/Scranton sweeps Albany and Norfolk

That would create a log jam of three teams at the top of the division, all with 49 wins. Hershey and Bridgeport would have 106 points; Wilkes-Barre/Scranton would have 104 setting up the game of the year in the regular season at 6:00 on Easter Sunday in Hershey between the Bears and the Penguins for the division championship. If the Penguins were to win in regulation, they would win the division by virtue of having more wins (50 to 49 each for Hershey and Bridgeport) while tying the other two with 106 points.

Add that to your weekend hockey thoughts, and what a weekend it is shaping up to be.